Hi all,
Looking for a little advice if possible. I've recently bought an old house which needs a spot of work. First order of business is fixing the ground floor damp problems. What's got me stuck/nervous is the wall plate for the joists is actually built in to the brick wall (solid wall construction). This plate is rotten and also shows signs of woodworm so I'd like to replace it with fresh treated timber, along with the joists obviously.
I guess my question is, is it safe to remove the wall plate - I wonder if the flemish bond pattern would support the bricks above if it was removed? Or would I be safer doing it in shorter sections?
I quite like the idea of repairing it like-for-like but I appreciate that something like a new sleeper wall, just inside the external so the joists no longer penetrate the external wall, would have better damp resistance. But then I think to myself, this lasted a hundred years already why bother with a new sleeper wall?
Looking for a little advice if possible. I've recently bought an old house which needs a spot of work. First order of business is fixing the ground floor damp problems. What's got me stuck/nervous is the wall plate for the joists is actually built in to the brick wall (solid wall construction). This plate is rotten and also shows signs of woodworm so I'd like to replace it with fresh treated timber, along with the joists obviously.
I guess my question is, is it safe to remove the wall plate - I wonder if the flemish bond pattern would support the bricks above if it was removed? Or would I be safer doing it in shorter sections?
I quite like the idea of repairing it like-for-like but I appreciate that something like a new sleeper wall, just inside the external so the joists no longer penetrate the external wall, would have better damp resistance. But then I think to myself, this lasted a hundred years already why bother with a new sleeper wall?