- Joined
- 2 Dec 2007
- Messages
- 17
- Reaction score
- 0
- Country
Please can someone advise. The house next door to us has been tenanted for a number of years, but the landlord has now sold the property and the tenants have moved out. We have lived here for 10 years and the roof on this adjoining property has always been in a poor state, as the landlord has never maintained the exterior of the property. I think there are even missing slates, as one looks like it is in the properties guttering just by our front door and we are always worried it will drop on our heads.
Obviously there is a central line between the roofs, as on any terraced houses, the tiles in this area (they like edging tiles) fall on the other house side and have been deteriorating over the years and seem to have slipped out in places. We did check with a roofer about these tiles, when we had some storm damage repaired on our roof a couple of years ago to get advice on replacing them and he told us they were on the tenanted properties roof and therefore it was for them to resolve. But, the landlord is saying that it is a joint responsibility. However, I don't believe it is, because they are raised up from our roof and our roof is in a decent condition as we have maintained it.
Who is right, any ideas? I've looked on the internet and can't find anything really that answers it. I would be inclined to agree it was joint if the tiles of both roofs butted against each other. But this is a raised up edge line on their property side.
I don't want to shirk responsibility, but I also don't have the money to pay for something that potentially isn't for me to be paying.
Obviously there is a central line between the roofs, as on any terraced houses, the tiles in this area (they like edging tiles) fall on the other house side and have been deteriorating over the years and seem to have slipped out in places. We did check with a roofer about these tiles, when we had some storm damage repaired on our roof a couple of years ago to get advice on replacing them and he told us they were on the tenanted properties roof and therefore it was for them to resolve. But, the landlord is saying that it is a joint responsibility. However, I don't believe it is, because they are raised up from our roof and our roof is in a decent condition as we have maintained it.
Who is right, any ideas? I've looked on the internet and can't find anything really that answers it. I would be inclined to agree it was joint if the tiles of both roofs butted against each other. But this is a raised up edge line on their property side.
I don't want to shirk responsibility, but I also don't have the money to pay for something that potentially isn't for me to be paying.