royal murder
- Thread starter billyo
- Start date
Sponsored Links
i do not believe there was a "Royal Murder", all these conscpirocy theories keep doing the rounds, in this instance why would "they" try to kill people in this way, it is too far fetched and has suited el fayed to keep himself in the news, other reports say Diana was going to marry someone else, let it go is what i say
Fayed is a megalomaniac and is responsible for the debacle that is now the Diana inquest. This is funded by you and me to the tune of a few million pounds.
Fayed was refused a passport several years ago and has never forgiven this country.
I feel sorry for the likes of the bodyguard, now labeled as a criminal, the sister, "an accomplice to the murder" and other members of Diana's family watching her death dissected in detail due to a sad rich old Arab with a huge chip on his shoulder.
Fayed was refused a passport several years ago and has never forgiven this country.
I feel sorry for the likes of the bodyguard, now labeled as a criminal, the sister, "an accomplice to the murder" and other members of Diana's family watching her death dissected in detail due to a sad rich old Arab with a huge chip on his shoulder.
Sponsored Links
I am as interested in this story as much as the Maddy case, Macca's divorce Amy and Britney 
Macca!! i would have stayed married to him longer than 4 years for that kind of money, AND i would have kept my trap shut AND i am a man (well male)
the maddie case has bothered me more than other similar cases i don't know why, i just hope and pray that she turns up safe and well
the maddie case has bothered me more than other similar cases i don't know why, i just hope and pray that she turns up safe and well
You cant beat the establishment they are far too clever and have endless resources to make even the most plausible witness look like a bumbling fool.
One of the strongest tools used by them is to make a person look foolish and work on the fact that the majority will then alienate themselves from that person and believe whats spoonfed them from the authorities without analysing it deeply.
Trouble with this case is that a lot of evidence is based on witness statements rather than hard evidence which convieniently is no longer available.
In this case do you believe Mohammed Al Fayed or a Government that has in the past been known to alter the truth?
I can forgive the outburst outside the court where Al Fayed calls the reporter a member of MI6, he is a hot blooded foreigner who has fought for many years to get to the truth and sometimes without the ability to be articulate in the english language when confronted by someone who you believe is against you it is easy for an emotional outburst to come out which you may later regret ( how many times in a heated argument has one said something they didnt mean?) the powers that be must have loved that and maybe its not so far fetched to think that someone could have been planted knowing the emotional nature of Al Fayed at that moment after having observed his actions in court previously.
The courts seem to have done a good job in destroying Al Fayed's Character as a witness but does that make the Establishment squeaky clean?
Although its off subject i'm using it as an analogy, look how DJ's on the radio can influence vast audiences to like certain groups and ridicule others so much that a person in a group of peers would rather agree that a group or band is rubbish even if they secretly love their music. Just an example of how powerful suggestion can be when applied properly.
The establishment is a master of suggestion and influence.
One of the strongest tools used by them is to make a person look foolish and work on the fact that the majority will then alienate themselves from that person and believe whats spoonfed them from the authorities without analysing it deeply.
Trouble with this case is that a lot of evidence is based on witness statements rather than hard evidence which convieniently is no longer available.
In this case do you believe Mohammed Al Fayed or a Government that has in the past been known to alter the truth?
I can forgive the outburst outside the court where Al Fayed calls the reporter a member of MI6, he is a hot blooded foreigner who has fought for many years to get to the truth and sometimes without the ability to be articulate in the english language when confronted by someone who you believe is against you it is easy for an emotional outburst to come out which you may later regret ( how many times in a heated argument has one said something they didnt mean?) the powers that be must have loved that and maybe its not so far fetched to think that someone could have been planted knowing the emotional nature of Al Fayed at that moment after having observed his actions in court previously.
The courts seem to have done a good job in destroying Al Fayed's Character as a witness but does that make the Establishment squeaky clean?
Although its off subject i'm using it as an analogy, look how DJ's on the radio can influence vast audiences to like certain groups and ridicule others so much that a person in a group of peers would rather agree that a group or band is rubbish even if they secretly love their music. Just an example of how powerful suggestion can be when applied properly.
The establishment is a master of suggestion and influence.
i saw the bodyguards version on discovery, they seemed to imply that someone was feeding the media as to what the couple were doing.
since they were reacting to the media chase then someone really close and in the know must have been briefing the press.
who would be most pleased that diana was seen in public!
who would love to rub prince phillip's nose in it.
i believe the guards not someone with a previous axe to grind.
i dont work for mi5 or 6 (im too tall) and i do believe that the bbc would say whatever they had too to divert/alter the case if it suited themselves and the establishment.
i believe al-fayed was briefing the press and there was an accident caused by a number of things.
i feel now that al-fayed is lashing out at everyone else rather than face his part in all this.
he lost his son and i feel very sorry for him but one day you have to stop blaming..
since they were reacting to the media chase then someone really close and in the know must have been briefing the press.
who would be most pleased that diana was seen in public!
who would love to rub prince phillip's nose in it.
i believe the guards not someone with a previous axe to grind.
i dont work for mi5 or 6 (im too tall) and i do believe that the bbc would say whatever they had too to divert/alter the case if it suited themselves and the establishment.
i believe al-fayed was briefing the press and there was an accident caused by a number of things.
i feel now that al-fayed is lashing out at everyone else rather than face his part in all this.
he lost his son and i feel very sorry for him but one day you have to stop blaming..
is it a fact that the guy driving might have had a drink was speeding hit a wall and that was that, my cousin was driving in a well lit road in good weather at 2 am feel asleep at the wheel and was killed outright, shi##
happens
my cousin was driving in a well lit road in good weather at 2 am feel asleep at the wheel and was killed outright, shi## happens
Sponsored Links
