Hi all,
I'm looking at replacing most of the radiators in my mid-terrace 3 bed Victorian house (in London) and want to check if I'm getting the numbers right and making reasonable assumptions. I've been using this BTU calculator on bestheating.com to figure out the heat requirements for each room (as it seems to be one of the ones that uses more information).
We are considering getting a heat pump in the future, which I understand will have a lower flow temperature and therefore operate at a lower Delta. So, I have come up with 2 options for sets of radiators to buy - one set to work at Delta T50 and another for Delta T30 (which would future proof against the heat pump).
As an example, one room on the ground floor is 2.9m W x 3.2m L x 2.8m H. It has one external wall and a double glazed glass door to the garden. The required BTU is apparently 3404. For Delta T50 I can get a Type 22 500x800mm rad that is rated for 4351 BTU. For Delta T30, I would have to size it up to a Type 22 600x1000mm (the largest that would reasonably fit) which is rated for only 3224.
In general, for Delta T50, it's very easy to find rads that meet the heat requirements of each room and more, so I have chosen a set that meet the BTU requirement + 20%. On the other hand, it's quite hard to find rads for every room that will match that performance for Delta T30 mainly due to the size restrictions from the configuration of the walls, windows, current pipe positions etc. This means that the rads I have selected for Delta T30 are mostly rated for just under the heat requirement.
I wanted to check whether:
a) The way I'm going about this sounds more or less reasonable.
b) Whether, given their flow temperatures, a heat pump is likely to actually need to run at Delta T30 (rather than say Delta T being more like 40˚C)?
c) Is it ok to have rads that are rated a bit less than the BTU requirement for a room. If, so what is the leeway you can get away with?
d) Is there a problem if you have a big differential in the relative rating of each rad?
I'm looking at replacing most of the radiators in my mid-terrace 3 bed Victorian house (in London) and want to check if I'm getting the numbers right and making reasonable assumptions. I've been using this BTU calculator on bestheating.com to figure out the heat requirements for each room (as it seems to be one of the ones that uses more information).
We are considering getting a heat pump in the future, which I understand will have a lower flow temperature and therefore operate at a lower Delta. So, I have come up with 2 options for sets of radiators to buy - one set to work at Delta T50 and another for Delta T30 (which would future proof against the heat pump).
As an example, one room on the ground floor is 2.9m W x 3.2m L x 2.8m H. It has one external wall and a double glazed glass door to the garden. The required BTU is apparently 3404. For Delta T50 I can get a Type 22 500x800mm rad that is rated for 4351 BTU. For Delta T30, I would have to size it up to a Type 22 600x1000mm (the largest that would reasonably fit) which is rated for only 3224.
In general, for Delta T50, it's very easy to find rads that meet the heat requirements of each room and more, so I have chosen a set that meet the BTU requirement + 20%. On the other hand, it's quite hard to find rads for every room that will match that performance for Delta T30 mainly due to the size restrictions from the configuration of the walls, windows, current pipe positions etc. This means that the rads I have selected for Delta T30 are mostly rated for just under the heat requirement.
I wanted to check whether:
a) The way I'm going about this sounds more or less reasonable.
b) Whether, given their flow temperatures, a heat pump is likely to actually need to run at Delta T30 (rather than say Delta T being more like 40˚C)?
c) Is it ok to have rads that are rated a bit less than the BTU requirement for a room. If, so what is the leeway you can get away with?
d) Is there a problem if you have a big differential in the relative rating of each rad?