My partner and I recently purchased our first home in South Wales. It's a 1930s build with a welsh slate roof. I don't know how old the roof is but it could potentially be as old as the house. The survey flagged up that the underfelt and battens needed replacing and we had several quotes to do this. Two of them told us that they existing slate roof would also need replacing and suggested using fiber cement slates instead (my first regret is that I did not do more research into this claim). We decided to go with one of these roofers who was offering to do the work at a very reasonable price.
The roofer started Monday and called me up to say that he's changed his mind about the fiber cement slate and thought a conrete tile would be better for the roof. I was busy at work at the time and trusted that he was the expert (my second regret).
The tiles arrived today and I did some more research and realised that planning permission would be required to change the tiles from slate to concrete and that we should have had a structural engineer assess the suitability of the joists for a heavier roof. I called him this evening and told him this, and he has agreed to send the tiles back and go with the original plan to replace them with the fiber cement slates which weigh about the same as real slate. That's fine, but I also noticed that, while he originally told me that the original Welsh slate could not be salvaged, the workers have neatly stacked around 90% of the slate tiles on the scaffolding, fully intact.
My concern is that I've been lied to and that this slate is in fine condition to reuse. It seems obvious that he intends to sell it on. My plan tomorrow is to go ahead with the fiber cement slate, as that's what he's quoted us for and I don't trust them to have the expertise to install real slate, but to ask them to leave the real slate on site. That way, I can either sell it on myself or get a different roofer to reinstall it later. As far as I can see, he can't take issue with this as, if the slate is too poor to reuse (as he has told us it was) then I'm saving him money scrapping it.
Am I being screwed over? What do you think the right move is from this point?
The roofer started Monday and called me up to say that he's changed his mind about the fiber cement slate and thought a conrete tile would be better for the roof. I was busy at work at the time and trusted that he was the expert (my second regret).
The tiles arrived today and I did some more research and realised that planning permission would be required to change the tiles from slate to concrete and that we should have had a structural engineer assess the suitability of the joists for a heavier roof. I called him this evening and told him this, and he has agreed to send the tiles back and go with the original plan to replace them with the fiber cement slates which weigh about the same as real slate. That's fine, but I also noticed that, while he originally told me that the original Welsh slate could not be salvaged, the workers have neatly stacked around 90% of the slate tiles on the scaffolding, fully intact.
My concern is that I've been lied to and that this slate is in fine condition to reuse. It seems obvious that he intends to sell it on. My plan tomorrow is to go ahead with the fiber cement slate, as that's what he's quoted us for and I don't trust them to have the expertise to install real slate, but to ask them to leave the real slate on site. That way, I can either sell it on myself or get a different roofer to reinstall it later. As far as I can see, he can't take issue with this as, if the slate is too poor to reuse (as he has told us it was) then I'm saving him money scrapping it.
Am I being screwed over? What do you think the right move is from this point?
Last edited: