Quite frequently on The house built for £100k the architect bloke goes on about the cost of plasterboard being high in comparison with say OSB or ply so these people end up with these alternatives as wall coverings.
I always thought plasterboard was relatively cheap and saw in B&Q that roughly similar ply cost £28 compared to £7 for the equivalent ply. Even taking into account trade prices and finishing (which you may not need to do if you are happy to have ply nailed to your walls instead), is there really a huge difference in the cost of plaster vs ply? No idea how much OSB costs but I suspect it's cheaper than ply/more than plaster?
I would expect that if someone lined a property themselves with PB then got someone to skim it wouldn't cost more than ply everywhere?
Is the architect talking out of his *rse?
I always thought plasterboard was relatively cheap and saw in B&Q that roughly similar ply cost £28 compared to £7 for the equivalent ply. Even taking into account trade prices and finishing (which you may not need to do if you are happy to have ply nailed to your walls instead), is there really a huge difference in the cost of plaster vs ply? No idea how much OSB costs but I suspect it's cheaper than ply/more than plaster?
I would expect that if someone lined a property themselves with PB then got someone to skim it wouldn't cost more than ply everywhere?
Is the architect talking out of his *rse?