The reality of the state our military defence

Joined
7 Nov 2023
Messages
3,381
Reaction score
1,322
Country
United Kingdom
Ageing and failing equipment, takes years to replace and as I keep banging on, we do not have the capability of a long war at this moment in time. We are the poor relatives in comparison to our NATO allies.
America the rest of Europe will bail us out. (y)
 
The British army’s £3.2bn delayed battlefield communications system threatens to become the Ministry of Defence’s “next procurement disaster”, critics have warned.The next-generation tactical communications system, known as Morpheus, is due to replace technology first introduced almost 20 years ago.Sometimes described as the “brain” of the army’s future armoured vehicles, it is pitched as a network that will connect sensors, commanders and weapons. The project involves both software and hardware, including battlefield radios.Morpheus was due to enter service in the middle of this decade, but some MPs and defence analysts have warned it was unlikely to be ready for use before 2030.James Cartlidge, the defence procurement minister, said in a written statement last month that the system was delayed and would not enter service in 2025 as planned, adding that a “revised [date] was yet to be defined pending ongoing contractual discussions” with US-based General Dynamics, which is the lead contractor on the first phase of the project.Responding to parliamentary questions tabled by Mark Francois, a Conservative MP and former armed forces minister, Cartlidge also disclosed that about £690mn has been spent on the system so far.The Ministry of Defence had previously warned of setbacks with the contract, declaring in December that an initial phase of the Morpheus project had “fallen considerably short of what was anticipated”.
 
Don't know why they might still be using manned tanks when they can use drone missiles etc.. I would have thought crewless tanks was the next logical step if there is still a need for them at all.
 
Ageing and failing equipment, takes years to replace and as I keep banging on, we do not have the capability of a long war at this moment in time. We are the poor relatives in comparison to our NATO allies.
There’s always the nuclear option. Just lob one or two of them at anyone thinking of picking a scrap with us and ….job done. (y)
 
Ageing and failing equipment, takes years to replace and as I keep banging on, we do not have the capability of a long war at this moment in time. We are the poor relatives in comparison to our NATO allies.

Just like the rest of capital and public spending then.
 
Ageing and failing equipment, takes years to replace and as I keep banging on, we do not have the capability of a long war at this moment in time. We are the poor relatives in comparison to our NATO allies.
Why have taxes kept increasing whilst public services kept on shrinking?

A = growing wealth inequality.

More and more wealth and assets being concentrated in a very small group of people.

If you’ve voted Tory since the 80s this is on you
 
Take the defence budget and divide by the number of people in the country and let people defend themselves.
(with scaffold poles?)
 
There’s always the nuclear option. Just lob one or two of them at anyone thinking of picking a scrap with us and ….job done. (y)
That sounds sensible, just as long as the country you are lobbing them at don't have any to lob back.
 
Can NATO beat Russia in an all out war without the U.S?

If comes to an existential fight for Russia, it won't just be Russia that NATO will be at war with.
China has an alliance with Russia, a defeated Russia would then become an existential theat to China.
 
There’s always the nuclear option. Just lob one or two of them at anyone thinking of picking a scrap with us and ….job done. (y)
The wokies want us to do away with the ones we already have. The strategy instead is to offer any aggressor a sit down cuppa, with cakes, and talk the issues through.
 
Back
Top