the Royal family.

[noseall]

a recent comment got me thinking do we really need the cash sapping royals?

are they an financial asset or a financial hindrance?

historically this country is a kingdom. for recent generations, it is all we know.

but are these views dated?

i personally don't mind coffing an axtra 50p per week in taxes to keep the royals. rather they had it than some scrote anyhow.

 

[joe-90]

I think as an example of the British population they are a complete disaster. I dunno why but whenever I see Prince Charles the word 'inbreeding' springs to mind. Harry is a useless yob and there are hundreds on the payroll that I've never even heard of. However, the tourists like 'em so I vote they remain.

 

[corgiman]

Gawd bless em I say

as lord kitchener once said

"england needs you, to die in your thousands in france while the royal family stay at home supporting the germans"

I know its a quote from viz, but dont you think its time we kicked out these pretenders and put our REAL royal family back on the throne?

I would say lets have a president, but there is a good chance that it could be BLAIR!!!!!!!!!!!!!



Shiver

 

[solo]

Leave them alone I say. Nanna has just won an award so they must be doing some good.

 

[Deluks]

They should stay, but be thoroughly self supporting.

Which is not very hard, they have so many fingers in so many pies; land and castles and tourist attractions etc etc. Just being in the Royal Family brings in enough dough without them needing taxpayers money. They are just posh 'benefit' fraudsters.

 

[Richardp]

Send them back to Germany