I get a bit confused about touch voltage calculations. As this ramble will show.
Especially when it involves supplementary bonding.
So the resistance between exposed conductive parts and Extraneous conductive parts has to fulfil this formula
RA x Ia < 50 v
So in a bathroom.
Ia is the operating current of the protective device.
But which protective device?
I presume the highest rated device (A) that provides power to the bathroom
This is for an installation with no RCD
So in a bathroom you could have the following directly in the room such as a 6A lighting circuit
An electric shower protected by a 50 A MCB
Hot water which comes from a boiler,not located in the bathroom, but has a conductive path to the bathroom via the copper pipe work
So what would be the protective device for the boiler? Which usually has a 3A fuse.
It could be taken from a ring final circuit protected via a 32A mcb
So would the protective device be a 3 amp fuse or the 32A MCB?
(As a side matter)
I understand the pipework is an Extraneous conductive part.
A boiler would be and exposed conductive part, so in my mind that would make any metallic pipe work coming from it also exposed?
If a fault happened on the boiler, that fault current would appear on the pipe work.
But pipe work , radiators etc are classed as Extraneous?
But back to the formula.
So if my maths is correct if it was just a 6A lighting circuit - 50/30 =1.6ohms
shower 50/250 = 0.21ohms
So if the resistance between a lighting fixture cpc and a towel rail is < 1.6ohms supplementary protection is not needed?
But if you had a class 2 fitting the resistance would be infinite
And if 0.21 was the resistance between the shower and a towel rail, supplementary protection is not needed?
But then I read about maximum fault current being 0.01A
Then take into account 1000 ohms fingertip resistance??
So we are looking at a resistance of 22000Ohms
Which needs an IR test
So if a known earth and and Extraneous part is < 22000ohms it needs bonding, but if its more bonding not required
The voltage and current touch voltage requirements seems to be in opposite directions
I hope that makes some sense
Thanks
Especially when it involves supplementary bonding.
So the resistance between exposed conductive parts and Extraneous conductive parts has to fulfil this formula
RA x Ia < 50 v
So in a bathroom.
Ia is the operating current of the protective device.
But which protective device?
I presume the highest rated device (A) that provides power to the bathroom
This is for an installation with no RCD
So in a bathroom you could have the following directly in the room such as a 6A lighting circuit
An electric shower protected by a 50 A MCB
Hot water which comes from a boiler,not located in the bathroom, but has a conductive path to the bathroom via the copper pipe work
So what would be the protective device for the boiler? Which usually has a 3A fuse.
It could be taken from a ring final circuit protected via a 32A mcb
So would the protective device be a 3 amp fuse or the 32A MCB?
(As a side matter)
I understand the pipework is an Extraneous conductive part.
A boiler would be and exposed conductive part, so in my mind that would make any metallic pipe work coming from it also exposed?
If a fault happened on the boiler, that fault current would appear on the pipe work.
But pipe work , radiators etc are classed as Extraneous?
But back to the formula.
So if my maths is correct if it was just a 6A lighting circuit - 50/30 =1.6ohms
shower 50/250 = 0.21ohms
So if the resistance between a lighting fixture cpc and a towel rail is < 1.6ohms supplementary protection is not needed?
But if you had a class 2 fitting the resistance would be infinite
And if 0.21 was the resistance between the shower and a towel rail, supplementary protection is not needed?
But then I read about maximum fault current being 0.01A
Then take into account 1000 ohms fingertip resistance??
So we are looking at a resistance of 22000Ohms
Which needs an IR test
So if a known earth and and Extraneous part is < 22000ohms it needs bonding, but if its more bonding not required
The voltage and current touch voltage requirements seems to be in opposite directions
I hope that makes some sense
Thanks