As my other posts may hint at I've been poking around a lot in the loft of my Victorian(ish) end terrace house. It has a slate roof which is open at the back (no felt/sarking) so I'm looking straight at the underside of the slates.
There's lots of mortar on the battens and under the slates. Most of this is loose and quite a lot has fallen out just naturally and owing to various older roof repairs. Say about 30%. Of the remainder, almost all of it is loose. So almost none of it is sticking the tiles to the battens, if that was the original idea.
I can't believe those old builders would have gone to the trouble of mixing up all that mortar (by hand in those days) for nothing, so I'm wondering what it was really for. It might have some effect even now acting as a (rather loose) wedge between the tiles and the battens, which might stop the tiles moving a bit if it's windy.
It would be interesting to know why this was originally done, if it makes any difference to anything if it's not there, and if anyone ever replaces it these days.
There's lots of mortar on the battens and under the slates. Most of this is loose and quite a lot has fallen out just naturally and owing to various older roof repairs. Say about 30%. Of the remainder, almost all of it is loose. So almost none of it is sticking the tiles to the battens, if that was the original idea.
I can't believe those old builders would have gone to the trouble of mixing up all that mortar (by hand in those days) for nothing, so I'm wondering what it was really for. It might have some effect even now acting as a (rather loose) wedge between the tiles and the battens, which might stop the tiles moving a bit if it's windy.
It would be interesting to know why this was originally done, if it makes any difference to anything if it's not there, and if anyone ever replaces it these days.