My sister has recently converted an old barn in a conservation area. The original building consisted of three single brick walls, tiled roof and large sliding wooden doors across the whole frontage.
Details of materials were submitted to meet a compliance condition and described by architect as 'to match existing'. Reused bricks and tiles were used to build new frontage and dormers in roof.
The building work has then completed.
Now the council are objecting to the windows as somebody called them to point out that they are uPVC (it is not at all obvious). They are not cheap white ones, but high end oak effect frames.
It seems there was a loophole. The issue of the materials for the windows never came up as there were previously no existing windows with which to match.
Does anyone have any thoughts on the situation. Is it worth fighting and what steps should be taken?
Details of materials were submitted to meet a compliance condition and described by architect as 'to match existing'. Reused bricks and tiles were used to build new frontage and dormers in roof.
The building work has then completed.
Now the council are objecting to the windows as somebody called them to point out that they are uPVC (it is not at all obvious). They are not cheap white ones, but high end oak effect frames.
It seems there was a loophole. The issue of the materials for the windows never came up as there were previously no existing windows with which to match.
Does anyone have any thoughts on the situation. Is it worth fighting and what steps should be taken?