Was this to be expected......?

[JulieL/B]

Paul McCartney and Heather Mills have seperated

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/entertainment/4989240.stm

Hmmmm now why am I not suprised?

 

[JohnD]

"The musician is worth an estimated £800m, and Mills has revealed in the past that he turned down her offer to sign a prenuptial agreement to protect his fortune. "

Hahahahahahaha!


Although I have heard that she has the Geoffrey Archer approach to truth.

 

[johnny_t]

I feel a bit sorry for them. No-one really knows what she is like, but she seems to be almost universally damned by the press for no good reason, and it has eventually torn them apart.

Don't weep too much for Macca - I'm sure that even if he goes down to 400 million in the bank, it'll still keep him in hair dye.....

 

[Nige F]

He....won`t have a leg to stand on

 

[pickles]

He had just buried the last wife when he married this one so it's hardly suprising it's gone pear shaped so fast

All Rock stars should be killed when they get to about 40 to spare the rest of us their increasingly desperate attempts to get attention and stay relevant.
Look at Mick Jagger drawing his pension and still strutting about in tight trousers trying to look sexy. It's painful. People only watch in case he ruptures himself

 

[Richardp]

the stones arent a good example, they was born to be old rock stars, ronnie wood and keith richard are and always will be true rockers.
Paul McCartney even as a beatle was lightweight.
I feel sorry for the kids............no suprises

 

[2scoops0406]

Our parting is amicable, and I only want half of the old washed up, didn't write most of the beatles hits, perma tanned has been's wealth. The woman is a serial opportunist, what do you reckon, given the chance of her physog in the papers, and a load of cash, I'm sure she'd support fur farming. She is a complete Phoney. IMHO WITHOUT PREJUDICE, all opinions expressed are entirely those of someone else.

 

[Richardp]

very good

 

[JohnD]

... she seems to be almost universally damned by the press for no good reason....

she does appear to be in the habit of telling fibs.

 

[williams89]

JohnD You mentioned the Jeffrey Archer approach to truth.
Jeffrey archers' sentence was OUTRAGEOUS. Every time a member of the government stands at the dispatch box, we hear lies. They have the protection of the house. Even outside parliament buildings they lie on a daily basis. Lord Archer got got grassed by a so called friend. He has raised millions for charity. He has had enough problems to overcome. Why not give just leave the man alone.


BE HAPPY

 

[markie]

She is going to get 200 mil pay off, can't be bad

 

[JohnD]

JohnD You mentioned the Jeffrey Archer approach to truth.
Jeffrey archers' sentence was OUTRAGEOUS. Every time a member of the government stands at the dispatch box, we hear lies. They have the protection of the house. Even outside parliament buildings they lie on a daily basis. Lord Archer got got grassed by a so called friend. He has raised millions for charity. He has had enough problems to overcome. Why not give just leave the man alone.


BE HAPPY

But wasn't he jailed for perjury, when he sued a newspaper for libel, after they'd published something about him which was in fact true? And he tried to get an honest man who was his friend to back him up by telling lies under oath?

What would a correct sentence be, then? He may have enough problems, but he might have fewer if he didn't cause them himself.

Old spotty-back is now well-known as a serial adulterer, but he got his wife to support him in claiming that he wasn't, and found a way of making megabucks out of libel cases.

Sadly the prostitute whom he was witnessed paying thousands of pounds to, he claims for nothing, died later.


...ah yes, here we are. What punishment should I get, if I try to take half-a-million by lies and fraud?

Charges

Lord Archer faced dishonesty charges arising from his successful 1987 libel action, in which he won £500,000 damages from the Daily Star over allegations that he slept with a prostitute.

He was accused of asking his former friend Mr Francis, 67, to provide him with a false alibi for a night relating to the libel case and of producing fake diary entries to back up his story.



Lord Archer was found guilty of two charges of perjury and two of perverting the course of justice.

The first charge was that he perverted the course of justice by asking Ted Francis to give him a false alibi.

The second guilty verdict was on a charge that he perverted the course of justice by using a fake diary in the libel trial.

He was found to have perjured himself in an affadavit to the High Court for the libel action.

He was also found to have perjured himself on oath during the libel trial.

 

[Moz]

maybe she can go back to HER career of entertaining Rich Arab Businessmen ...

she is the type that gives Gold diggers a bad name ..lol
a sad delusional tart...


maybe she will go get legless ..lol


I bet he wishes he had listened too his family now ...

 

[williams89]

JohnD You mentioned the Jeffrey Archer approach to truth.
Jeffrey archers' sentence was OUTRAGEOUS. Every time a member of the government stands at the dispatch box, we hear lies. They have the protection of the house. Even outside parliament buildings they lie on a daily basis. Lord Archer got got grassed by a so called friend. He has raised millions for charity. He has had enough problems to overcome. Why not give just leave the man alone.


BE HAPPY

But wasn't he jailed for perjury, when he sued a newspaper for libel, after they'd published something about him which was in fact true? And he tried to get an honest man who was his friend to back him up by telling lies under oath?

What would a correct sentence be, then? He may have enough problems, but he might have fewer if he didn't cause them himself.

Old spotty-back is now well-known as a serial adulterer, but he got his wife to support him in claiming that he wasn't, and found a way of making megabucks out of libel cases.

Sadly the prostitute whom he was witnessed paying thousands of pounds to, he claims for nothing, died later.


...ah yes, here we are. What punishment should I get, if I try to take half-a-million by lies and fraud?

Charges

Lord Archer faced dishonesty charges arising from his successful 1987 libel action, in which he won £500,000 damages from the Daily Star over allegations that he slept with a prostitute.

He was accused of asking his former friend Mr Francis, 67, to provide him with a false alibi for a night relating to the libel case and of producing fake diary entries to back up his story.



Lord Archer was found guilty of two charges of perjury and two of perverting the course of justice.

The first charge was that he perverted the course of justice by asking Ted Francis to give him a false alibi.

The second guilty verdict was on a charge that he perverted the course of justice by using a fake diary in the libel trial.

He was found to have perjured himself in an affadavit to the High Court for the libel action.

He was also found to have perjured himself on oath during the libel trial.

LET HE WHO IS WITHOUT SIN CAST THE FIRST STONE!

 

[Moz]

williams89
an Im sure you dont want anyone to be without sin ,
to cast any stones your way ..lol