We have had some work done outside the work involves:
A power feed went direct into a shed that has since been removed.
So we wanted the armoured cable that comes underground out of the house and under the concrete base of the old shed that has been removed (concrete base on the right with the white conduit) cut, then re-connected to new armoured cable which then runs into the adjacent shed where a new consumer unit has been fitted.
The armoured cable you can see in the pic feeds another outbuilding approx 100ft away.
He has run armoured cable inside the adjacent shed, it's then cut into the concrete and goes direct into the little waterproof box in the pic. The original cable was then exposed by cutting the conduit and connecting into the weatherproof box.
The sparkys response is that the conduit was an afterthought on our behalf, and the circuit is protected by an RCD so it's not a problem.
The points he is missing is;
1. the cable should have been protected in conduit a matter of standard good working practise, as it is exposed to weather.
2. if the cable is damaged the cost to repair will be considerable - call-out charge, cable joint kit and new cable, in the country animals could damage the cable.
I asked him again to put the cable in conduit, He wants payment in full before returning - I've told him to return and complete the original job.
What are your thoughts
A power feed went direct into a shed that has since been removed.
So we wanted the armoured cable that comes underground out of the house and under the concrete base of the old shed that has been removed (concrete base on the right with the white conduit) cut, then re-connected to new armoured cable which then runs into the adjacent shed where a new consumer unit has been fitted.
The armoured cable you can see in the pic feeds another outbuilding approx 100ft away.
He has run armoured cable inside the adjacent shed, it's then cut into the concrete and goes direct into the little waterproof box in the pic. The original cable was then exposed by cutting the conduit and connecting into the weatherproof box.
The sparkys response is that the conduit was an afterthought on our behalf, and the circuit is protected by an RCD so it's not a problem.
The points he is missing is;
1. the cable should have been protected in conduit a matter of standard good working practise, as it is exposed to weather.
2. if the cable is damaged the cost to repair will be considerable - call-out charge, cable joint kit and new cable, in the country animals could damage the cable.
I asked him again to put the cable in conduit, He wants payment in full before returning - I've told him to return and complete the original job.
What are your thoughts