You're very mixed up about the legislation, and your lack of knowledge has tempted you to twist my words.Agile said:When was time considered to be of the essence?Softus said:No, unless he didn't finish the job in a reasonable time
Firstly, time was not made "of the essence". If it had then a failure to complete by the agreed date/time would have automatically led to compensation. Secondly, you might wish to have a read of the Act of Parliament that covers the work that you do. A commonly stated précis follows...
Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 (amended by Supply of Goods and Services Act 1994)
This states that work covered by the contract - which exists as soon as you ask someone to carry out some work for you, such as plumbing, dry cleaning, or building, must be carried out with reasonable skill and care, within a reasonable time, and for a reasonable price (if that's not stated) - but what is reasonable is not defined by law. If something goes wrong as a result of the work done - ask the contractor to put the work right, and if s/he won't, you are legally entitled to employ another contractor to rectify the problem and claim the costs from the original contractor.