Woman dies after attack (Ed.)

Sponsored Links
The prosecution need to prove she was alive at the time. Otherwise its the offence s70 sexual offences act.

which has a very light sentence.
 
Sponsored Links
A bit odd for someone to edit the title of this thread, without adding a comment... The Facts are he orally raped her while she was unconscious, repeatedly until she had a heart attack and died. Instead of assisting an unconscious person he decided to try to use her to get a blowie and claimed it was with consent.

In case anyone doesn't understand what Oral rape is. It is inserting a penis into someone's mouth without consent. Rape is when a person intentionally penetrates another's vagina, anus or mouth with a penis, without the other person's consent.

 
Last edited:
"Iidow is now facing a long term of imprisonment."

Hopefully 30 years minimum. On wait a sec, silly me, we're in the UK. He'll be out in a few months ...
 
I'll say it again.

Build MORE prisons.
Lock people up for LONGER where the crime or quantity of crimes merits it.
ADEQUATELY staff them and yes, ensure those who will be getting released are given rehabilitation courses.

Unfortunately the direction of travel in the UK seems to be lock people up for less time. So much for victim justice.
 
I'll say it again.

Build MORE prisons.
Lock people up for LONGER where the crime or quantity of crimes merits it.
ADEQUATELY staff them and yes, ensure those who will be getting released are given rehabilitation courses.

Unfortunately the direction of travel in the UK seems to be lock people up for less time. So much for victim justice.
We do not need more prisons.. we need better prisons that actually work and sentences that reflect the crime not a politicians wet dream to get re-elected... Have a look at the bbc documentary Parole... the last one covered a bloke that was locked up for 17 years after first getting an IPP sentence... the ones where you can serve indefinite time if you do not satisfy the parole board... He got 2.5 years for his orginal crime and is still in prison...as his crime was committed whilst under the influence of drugs, whilst in prison he has not managed to kick the habit and be released...after 17 years they have put him on a two year wait for a special unit to treat his drug addiction...

17 years in prison and he is still a drug addict...just whose fault is that.... probably ours as we keep telling the politicians that we want more and more people locked up for longer , hence the budget goes to incarnation rather that offender management eg Mental health services.. 14% of prisons have a serious mental health condition, treatment places available 0.4% of the prison population..so that means some 13.5% of prisoners are just dumped back on the streets untreated at the end of their sentence...and we wonder why a nutter goes berserk with a knife.
 
I'll say it again.

Build MORE prisons.
Lock people up for LONGER where the crime or quantity of crimes merits it.
ADEQUATELY staff them and yes, ensure those who will be getting released are given rehabilitation courses.

Unfortunately the direction of travel in the UK seems to be lock people up for less time. So much for victim justice.
Nail on head.

More prisons or not, staffing levels (cutbacks) need to improve.

But it needs taxation and anybody not "a lefty" is against that!
 
Not everyone in prison is best punished by a prison sentence. Many people in prison a very capable of working their sentence off at an accelerated rate with real work, which would reduce costs.

Not this guy. However.
 
17 years in prison and he is still a drug addict...just whose fault is that....
I’ve said it before but I’ll say it again, Mrs Mottie transcribes for some consultants. She is often transcribing the consultant saying "Now that mr/mrs/miss x is out of jail, they are going to try to give up drugs".
 
I’ve said it before but I’ll say it again, Mrs Mottie transcribes for some consultants. She is often transcribing the consultant saying "Now that mr/mrs/miss x is out of jail, they are going to try to give up drugs".
Question is, is there data available to say whether they were on drugs prior to incarceration, or did they turn to drugs when inside?
 
Question is, is there data available to say whether they were on drugs prior to incarceration, or did they turn to drugs when inside?
Irrelevant. My point is, they were able to get them inside.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top