D
Deleted member 221031
It’s the article in my first post. Yes.Was it a "Sky" report you were looking at?
It’s the article in my first post. Yes.Was it a "Sky" report you were looking at?
Yeah but, headlinesWhat are you on about, that is the report referred to in the MSM.
If you cant quote on it why try making uninformed commentsI’ve not read it so can’t comment on it.
My comments where based on the sky article and nothing else.
It's called research. The report itself tries to explain "why".The point is, why waste money on this scheme?
I get that. It’s just a waste of time and money.It's called research. The report itself tries to explain "why".
£1600 a month not a hand out ?And reduce the need for handouts to the poor.
£1600 a month not a hand out ?
So £1600 isn’t a handout ?Reduce the need, I said.
He will, I don't write anything I can't back up.
"Payment: £1,600 per month (pre-tax) to each participant for two years"
Page 39, https://autonomy.work/wp-content/uploads/2023/06/BASINC.pdf
They haven't got funding yet.How would this ridiculous idea be funded?
the aforementioned benefits to working might soon wear off............
I don't mean this study, i mean the whole concept of universal income. How would it be funded?They haven't got funding yet.
Like anything else, through taxation.I don't mean this study, i mean the whole concept of universal income. How would it be funded?