1980’s again

  • Thread starter Deleted member 221031
  • Start date
That's right chaps you you're not far apart even right now. The main problem with some of you
It's evident you spend too much time on here and it becomes an attachment. Step back from time to time let it go.
Or even, look at a bigger picture
 
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Sweden has more space and about 1/8th the population of Germany, and all the precious metals they will ever need. But still chose nuclear energy.

While apart from a research reactor Germany are nuclear free.

You’d think Sweden could be one of the greenest countries in the world.
 
You’d think Sweden could be one of the greenest countries in the world.
They do pretty good:
"Top 10 Greenest Countries
The top 10 greenest countries are as follows:

1) Sweden​


Coming in at first place is Sweden."
 
While apart from a research reactor Germany are nuclear free.
Which is why they aren't that green.
1688636481804.png

Behold all the coal they are burning, as they are shutting down nuclear power. They also import energy from their neighbours, such as nuclear power stations such as from France, and Czech. Imagine how little coal they would have to burn if they expanded their nuclear power, rather than shut them down (they could go to no coal at all if they built enough nuclear power stations).

Edit: Note that's capacity, not actual production.
 
Last edited:
Which is why they aren't that green.
View attachment 307525
Behold all the coal they are burning, as they are shutting down nuclear power. They also import energy from their neighbours, such as nuclear power stations such as from France, and Czech. Imagine how little coal they would have to burn if they expanded their nuclear power, rather than shut them down (they could go to no coal at all if they built enough nuclear power stations).

Edit: Note that's capacity, not actual production.
There we go then. I’ve learnt something without the need to be talked down too. Thank you.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top