A disabled man who starved to death after his benefits were wrongly stopped

[Deleted member 18243]

Errol Graham should not have been on benefits; he should have been in an institution. He had been "sectioned", or committed in plain English, and couldn't look after himself. State handouts should never be in cash.

 

[JohnD]

"I was only giving orders" say Smith

 

[JohnD]

The point is who is running these departments ?

The Conservative Government.

 

[transam]

Errol Graham should not have been on benefits; he should have been in an institution. He had been "sectioned", or committed in plain English, and couldn't look after himself. State handouts should never be in cash.

Oh the truth comes out now

funny how the others never mentioned it , although it is predictable

Propaganda again

economical with the actual alletare

ounce again Transam is mis lead

 

[transam]

The Conservative Government.

well best u take a leaf out of my book than and don't vote for em

 

[SirGalahad]

They voted for change and want more of this. Give it to them.

 

[transam]

They voted for change and want more of this. Give it to them.

Is this a post from the bloke with 3 degrees

yep it would appear so

Jeez us wept

 

[Notch7]

Errol Graham should not have been on benefits; he should have been in an institution. He had been "sectioned", or committed in plain English, and couldn't look after himself. State handouts should never be in cash.

He died because the state stopped his money
Not because he couldnt cope with having cash

Why do you keep up with your over simplistic binary attitude to benefits.
Cant you take on board these issues are complex and nuanced.

 

[transam]

He died because the state stopped his money
Not because he couldnt cope with having cash

Why do you keep up with your over simplistic binary attitude to benefits.
Cant you take on board these issues are complex and nuanced.

had the bloke been sanctioned under the mental health act or not ?

is this true ?

or is it a rumour ?

genuine question

 

[JohnD]

Robin Hood in reverse

Welfare cuts for the poor

Tax cuts for the rich

https://www.facebook.com/video.php?v=2443945055871431

 

[Notch7]

had the bloke been sanctioned under the mental health act or not ?

is this true ?

or is it a rumour ?

genuine question

What Andy11?

Definitely sectioned
Mad as a box of frogs
Hes a ok guy though

 

[JohnD]

had the bloke been sanctioned under the mental health act or not ?

is this true ?

or is it a rumour ?

genuine question

No doubt Andy can answer your question and show his evidence.

Errol Graham should not have been on benefits; he should have been in an institution. He had been "sectioned", or committed in plain English, and couldn't look after himself. State handouts should never be in cash.

 

[Vinty]

Errol Graham should not have been on benefits; he should have been in an institution. He had been "sectioned", or committed in plain English, and couldn't look after himself. State handouts should never be in cash.

You believe that bloke should have been sectioned?are you talking from experience.

 

[Vinty]

all due respect , but I dont quite see what Auschwitz has to do with it ??

who ever is responsible in the assesmant dept should be taken to task over the affair.


sack em , confiscate there pension pot ecft ect

personally I would go further and give em a smack in the mouth as well

Yes,have to admit the Auschwitz comparison was a bit over the top.
The only point I was trying make was the similar mindsets which led to both situations.
Obviously the level of human suffering involved in Auschwitz and Austerity are in no way comparable.

 

[JohnD]

When Iain Duncan Smith got a knighthood, it rewarded a system that broke people’s lives.


https://www.scotsman.com/news/opini...-the-knight-about-iain-duncan-smith-1-5067664