Surely it wasn't a sly dig at just one individual?bolo said:I know you do Softus. Why do you think I made the posting in the first place?
You're too sensitive.I also know that you have made some very valuable contributions to this forum in the past and that you will probably continue to do so. It is the nastiness in some of your replies that bothers me.
Er, no; it appears that you can't.It would appear that you just cant tell the difference between invective and light-hearted banter.
I'm sure you'll get the idea in time.Perhaps seasoned contributers have become accustomed to your abusive replies but that doesn't mean to say that they, the replies, are right.
bolo said:I know you do Softus. Why do you think I made the posting in the first place? I also know that you have made some very valuable contributions to this forum in the past and that you will probably continue to do so. It is the nastiness in some of your replies that bothers me. It would appear that you just cant tell the difference between invective and light-hearted banter. Perhaps seasoned contributers have become accustomed to your abusive replies but that doesn't mean to say that they, the replies, are right.
vokera80e said:where's "BANALLSHEDS" nowadays...let's have some good old banter, or as he left the building for good?
I know you do Softus. Why do you think I made the posting in the first place? I also know that you have made some very valuable contributions to this forum in the past and that you will probably continue to do so. It is the nastiness in some of your replies that bothers me. It would appear that you just cant tell the difference between invective and light-hearted banter. Perhaps seasoned contributers have become accustomed to your abusive replies but that doesn't mean to say that they, the replies, are right
More like totally worn outbolo said:Point taken Mod 10. But what happened to that button on the last posting on page 1? Did it jam
not for Softusbolo said:To refresh your memory Mod10, Softus wrote:
"I think it f***ing does".Is that not excessively abusive?
Please go ahead and explain who you think it abuses.bolo said:Is that not excessively abusive?
Ar*se.JohnD said:It's curmudgeonly.