- Joined
- 11 Jan 2004
- Messages
- 43,946
- Reaction score
- 2,884
- Country
BOB.DOLE said:securespark said:Mr Dole should know better by now than to think we are all complete numbskulls.
As my personal experience proves, you would get NOWHERE NEAR that sum for those injuries. Not in the UK, anyway. Also, as my personal experience proves, it can be successfully argued in court that there are circumstances where a driver can drive into the rear of the vehicle in front and for it to be the fault of that car's driver.
Eg , just the scenario that Mr UB40 describes. When cutting in front of someone, their braking distance is reduced. Couple that with idiotic braking on your part, and it can be argued that the accident is not your fault.
So wake up Mr Labour Exchange. We're not idiots.
Well your the bad example of a do gooder i do more work going to the toilet in a morning than you do all week sureprat, so you dont call me a dole spunger i have that honour to myself. Remember scotty its who yea know in the business cretin the world is an illusion just think of that scum bag proffessiobn your in £60billion whent on manegement last year its all corruption fool just try to grow up and stop pretending your someone special because you work in a profession, i work in a profession a lot higher than you dim wit , has the lord said let him who can see let him see said the lord.
I like this. I think I understand Mr Can'tbearsedworkingifIcanclaiumitoffyoulot now.
He must be annoyed. The more annoyed he gets, the more his spelling goes up the creek! Ha ha!!
Oh and BTW Mr Layabout, how can you be in a profession "a lot higher than you dim wit", when you profess to be a full time scrounger and blackguard?