No other manufacturer states that they test them individually, meaning they don't. If they did, they would be sure to tell people as it's a far more robust method.
Hmmm - we often see people here making comments about 'assumptions', and those comments become even more valid when the 'assumptions' are based on the absence of information.
I suspect that many, perhaps most, people will, even in the absence of any statement from thee manufacturer, expect that that any product of a 'safety-critical' nature will be subjected to at least some degree of individual inspection/testing -and it would not surprise me if there were some 'requirement' for that to be done with such products.
Let's face it, batch testing can only pick up systematic problems with a mass production process. It cannot pick up the sporadic defects in individual products which will inevitably arise with any manufactured product.
In fact, in terms of products in general, many of which are far from'safety critical', it is extremely common to find little "tested" stickers on each item. I do find it hard to believe that, even if manufacturers do not 'boast' about it (maybe because they consider it as 'obvious'?), any smoke alarms come to market without having undergone at least some individual testing'.
Mind you, even when there is individual testing, it tells one nothing about reliability of the particular item - a product which passes all tests when it comes off the production line may fail hours, days or weeks after being put into service!