IR8Matt said:
Cheers guys for your thoughts, just a few questions / clarifications...
Cant see any bonding cables leaving the board....
What are these?
The incoming service pipes (gas, water), assuming they are metal, should have a connection to earth. The earth cable that comes from direct from your incoming supply (
BTW - is that clamp an approved method of connection?) should go to a main earth terminal (MET). The MET should then be connected to the service pipes and to the earth block in the CU.
No RCD for the sockets....
What are the benefits and why should these been in place as opposed to what is there already?
An MCB provides protection against overload, either simply drawing too much current, or a short circuit.
However, there is another type of fault that an MCB will not protect against. If a person touches something live, e.g. a damaged cable or a faulty appliance and completes a circuit to earth, then the amount of current that will flow through them is more than enough to kill, but nowhere near enough to trip even the smallest MCB to cut off the supply.
An RCD monitors the currents flowing in the live and neutral conductors, so if somewhere in the circuit some current is leaking to earth, e.g. through a person, it will detect that there is a difference between the current flowing out on one conductor and back on the other, and it will trip.
The idea is that the level, and speed, with which it trips are such that injury is prevented. The normal RCD rating, as found in CUs and individual RCD sockets is 30mA, and an RCD is supposed to trip at that level of imbalance in 300ms, although typically the time is around 100ms.
In a CU, the RCD will protect a number of circuits - either some or all depending on whether the board is a split-load or not.
You can get devices which combine the functions of both an RCD and an MCB, i.e. provide overload and fault protection to a single circuit - they are used in place of an MCB, and are called RCBOs (Residual Current Breaker with Overload).
Sockets which can reasonably be expected to supply equipment outdoors should have RCD protection - that's generally interpreted to mean those on the ground floor, and, obviously, any actually outside, or in garages, sheds etc. However, it is also generally accepted that it's a useful safety measure to have all sockets with RCD protection.
The reason for not having everything on an RCD is that there are some circuits where the risk of contact is very low (e.g. lighting) and the inconvenience of losing the circuit due to an earth fault somewhere else is high (e.g. lighting) or dangerous (e.g. fire & smoke alarms).
In an ideal world your CU wouldn't have an RCD in it - you'd use RCBOs for each individual circuit that you wanted protected, but that gets expensive...
http://www.westernautomation.com/pages/demystify.htm
http://www.simonstutorials.com/downloads/rcdpresentation.pdf
http://www.memonline.com/guide06.html
those taped up joints look like they may be to pyro although it is hard to tell does the outer of those short stubs of cable appear to be copper?
What do u mean by this?
Pyro is sparky-speak for MICC - Mineral Insulated Copper Clad cable (sometimes called MICS - copper sheathed). It has copper inner conductors that are insulated with a mineral compound. The cable has an outer sheath of copper and can be further protected against the atmosphere by a outer plastic sheath.
1 - LSF oversheath
2 - copper sheath
3 - magnesium oxide insulation
4 - copper conductors
It's expensive to purchase and specialist skills are needed to install it. However, it is long lived, is smaller that an equivalent SWA cable and importantly is fire proof. Hence it can be used to serve emergency services where the cable is required to remain in use during fire conditions, and hence the nickname "pyro".
http://www.micable.com/mic05.html
PS - what's with the bundle of cables running down on the right, that have not come from the CU, and what are all the brown ones?