mkb isn't asking for a whip round so get off his back I say.
Either there is more to this story than we are being told, or its not true.
mkb isn't asking for a whip round so get off his back I say.
The Court Proceedings were to determine as to whether the cost of the original work justified the standard of the price stated at the time and that would have been what should have been reimbursed (Plus Legal Costs)
I do not believe the Court would have accepted that the work would cost Double the original price, that would mean the claimant is making a profit out of legal proceedings.
Something is not quite right IMO
Skimmed it??? I'd have built a new fookin wall.
You're still havin a pop Joe lad,
You're still havin a pop Joe lad,
Wasn't 'a wall' it was a hallway...the ceiling, wallpapering, glossing and the lounge ...ceiling, wallpapering and glossing.
As usual totally missed the point.
For £2,800 I'd have hired a couple of tradesmen to build and plaster the wall and a brush meister like yourself to clean up after them and go for the sarnies. And I'd have been quids in for doing eff all, that's business.
You wouldn't understand.
Self made millionaire peterperfection ? Doing what ? Or is that being nosey ?