Amber Rudd

Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Same thing here I was all for voting remain . Then noseall , JD and way r bee put the spanner in the works.
I am pleased to have been influential in your life.
Sadly it has had no effect on your honesty or integrity.
You are still as dishonest as you ever were, such a disappointment.
 
He says conveniently ignoring the fact that freedom of movement cannot be overridden by a member state.
There are some restrictions.


It quite simply is true.
If think it isnt, then do show me evidence where a nation state can impose any restrictions it likes on freedom of movement.
Freedom of movement is not the right to roam and settle anywhere at will. As you point out there are restrictions but those restrictions are wide ranging but rarely used (or never) employed by successive UK governments.
So any disappointment with the "freedom of movement" principle is generated by the inability or unwillingness of successive UK governments to apply those restrictions.

It shall entail the right, subject to limitations justified on grounds of public policy, public security or public health:
(a) to accept offers of employment actually made;
(b) to move freely within the territory of Member States for this purpose;
(c) to stay in a Member State for the purpose of employment in accordance with the provisions governing the employment of nationals of that State laid down by law, regulation or administrative action;
(d) to remain in the territory of a Member State after having been employed in that State, subject to conditions which shall be embodied in implementing regulations to be drawn up by the Commission.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement_for_workers_in_the_European_Union

In both the Treaty of Accession 2003 and the Treaty of Accession 2005, there is a clause about a transition period before workers from the new member states can be employed on an equal, non-discriminatory terms in the old member states.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Freedom_of_movement_for_workers_in_the_European_Union

please do point out these 'blatant lies'
If obfuscation can be described as "blatant lies" then there is your proof.
 
Sponsored Links
It looks like the aggressive policy against immigrants has also unfairly affected students
Sajid Javid warned over students forced from UK after language tests
Up to 4,000 foreign students falsely accused of cheating in visa tests, barred from courses and ordered to leave, says lawyer
The foreign students were targeted by the Home Office after an investigation by the BBC’s Panorama in 2014
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/...ting-language-tests-theresa-may-a8331906.html
When TM was Home Secretary.
The list of unfairly affected people is growing!
TM should go! And go now!
 
Last edited:
Poor old JohnD, still wrong.

Nation states can't opt out of freedom of movement.

There are some possible restrictions that may apply, but basically opt out is not available.
Eeyore is distorting the understanding of Freedom of Movement.
 
restrictions are wide ranging

They are not, do your research.

If there had been honesty about immigration, then we wouldn't be in the mess we are now.

I fully understand immigration has been a scapegoat and successive governments have, for various reasons not exercised available controls on EU immigration, but those on here that imply free movement of people can be overridden by a member state aren't helping the debate at all.
 
the ones he accuses other of doing

With a big difference, I have selected out a particular point that taken in isolation does not change its meaning.

JohnD deliberately truncated mine to prove a point which was incorrect had the whole post been considered.

Obviously that is all too nuanced for your comprehension :)
 
JohnD deliberately truncated mine to prove a point which was incorrect had the whole post been considered.
Which is precisely what you do every time.
PCBs, keyboards, DUP, all remainers accuse all Breixteers of being racist, ellal hates UK, etc, etc.
The list is endless.

Similarly, you make bogus allegations probably to cover up your own guilt.
 
Which is precisely what you do every time.
PCBs, keyboards, DUP, all remainers accuse all Breixteers of being racist, ellal hates UK, etc, etc.
The list is endless.

Similarly, you make bogus allegations probably to cover up your own guilt.
And you call people names, arse end, RWR etc when they hold different views to your own.
You're not exactly saintly yourself. It seems to be the way of most people on here!
 
And you call people names, arse end, RWR etc when they hold different views to your own.
You're not exactly saintly yourself. It seems to be the way of most people on here!
A**e end and I inevitably hold different views. His views, allegations, reports of what he heard on the radio, etc, are based on lies and fantasy. It is impossible to rely on anything he says. Everything has to be considered lies and/or fantasy.
Eeyore has the brains of a donkey, so to call him eeyore is appropriate. He demonstrates his lack of intellect continually.
Woody, roger, et al regularly demonstrate their racist views, so of course I will disagree with them. Who could not, except other racist or RWR, some of whom actively defend their racist comments.
Woody makes baseless allegations, and refuses to even attempt to defend his comments. probably because he has realised that his allegation was baseless. Yet he does not have the integrity to admit his mistake.

Now what has this to do with persistently misconstruing others' posts, as eeyore regularly does?
Perhaps it has more to do with diverting the truth, muddying the water, as you have just attempted to do, and a**e end and eeyore do regularly with their groundless allegations.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top