Another socialist ........hypocrite
- Thread starter gasbanni
- Start date
Sponsored Links
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,609
- Reaction score
- 552
- Country
LSE: founded by the Fabian socialist society -yup that'll make it impartial
Again logic fail. I am no supporter of the LSE.
You should try harder.
Look at policies and outcomes that are not shaped by ideologies.
I didnt say you were.
the logic fail is JohnD using a LSE link to justify journalistic representation of Jeremy Corbyn in the press.
This is a strange thread (aren't most?).
Not one mention of the original desired vilification of Tony Benn for not giving away all his money.
On a slightly different tack -
Viscount Stansgate had a huge struggle to renounce his title but eventually succeeded.
However, and I do find it strange, on his death the title still passes to his eldest son. Why should or would this be so?
Consequently, throughout his life, was Tony Benn still, effectively, Viscount Stansgate, or not?
When Edward abdicated, the title, King, passed to his brother and then to his brother's descendants.
Would it have reverted, on George's death, to Edward's descendants if he had had any?
Not one mention of the original desired vilification of Tony Benn for not giving away all his money.
On a slightly different tack -
Viscount Stansgate had a huge struggle to renounce his title but eventually succeeded.
However, and I do find it strange, on his death the title still passes to his eldest son. Why should or would this be so?
Consequently, throughout his life, was Tony Benn still, effectively, Viscount Stansgate, or not?
When Edward abdicated, the title, King, passed to his brother and then to his brother's descendants.
Would it have reverted, on George's death, to Edward's descendants if he had had any?
Sponsored Links
it's interesting that notch doesn't attempt to disprove the research.
Perhaps because the quality of research from one of the world's foremost academic institutions exceeds his own poor attempts.
This is always a problem for the hard right.
Educated, intelligent, diligent thinking people tend not to agree with them.
Can you think of a reason why?
The right think it must be due to bias.
Ah. Right. Jolly decent of him.
The report covers a huge period of time, wait no it doesnt, just September 2015 and October 2015.
2 whole months
(oh and only 24% of media in that period)And when? Oh yes just a few months before his own party gave him a vote of no confidence 172 to just 40
Educated, intelligent, diligent thinking labour MPs thought the same as the press
'Quality of research from one of the worlds most foremost socialist academic institutions'
I just have
If you search through papers to find negative comments about a political figure at a time when he is so unpopular with his own party, it doesnt much work to imagine the outcome. I cant think why they bothered, anybody couldve told them that.
Can and already have.
You would come back with some ammunition if you had any.
Your damp squid reply shows you cant
it's interesting that notch doesn't attempt to disprove the research.
That's because he can't.
poor old notch is too busy dredging through his four-year-old newspaper cuttings
If he thought he could disprove it he'd be trying.
but he can't.
That's because he can't.
poor old notch is too busy dredging through his four-year-old newspaper cuttings
If he thought he could disprove it he'd be trying.
but he can't.
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,609
- Reaction score
- 552
- Country
So I looked into that report and looked at what other academics are saying and it does seem quite clear there is bias.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/ent...sto-james-harding_uk_57adb2fce4b0f475601bd169
http://www.mediareform.org.uk/
To me this is the bigger issue.
Britain has one of the most concentrated media environments in the world, with 3 companies in control of 71% of national newspaper circulation and 5 companies in command of 81% of local newspaper titles.
Sponsored Links
