I offer help feely and put as simply and fiendly as possible because the experience of anyone reading what I say is unknown.
Naebothernoo may be relying on a software firewall alone. There may be practical difficulites I am unaware of.
I agree NAT hides a computer from the Internet which makes it a simple but effective firewall.
A hardware (or perimeter) firewall built into a broadband router is going to do absolutely nothing to outbound traffic and, even if it did, it has no possibility to be "application aware".
The only way to have application-level protection is to have a process running on the machine itself which identifies processes attempting to make outbound connections from the machine.
A perimeter firewall (even those with stateful packet inspection and rudimentary intrusion detection) typically looks only at ports and/or protocols for determining what is and is not allowed through.
I trust this allays your concerns sufficiently.
What it says.Softus said:"If you can"? What's that supposed to mean?pchelpman said:Yes, you should get a hardware firewall, if you can...
Naebothernoo may be relying on a software firewall alone. There may be practical difficulites I am unaware of.
I agree NAT hides a computer from the Internet which makes it a simple but effective firewall.
I have heard the view that, if one has a router/hardware firewall, a software firewall is irrelevant.Softus said:Hogwash. Most software firewalls clash with many other software products and local networks, use up system resources, contain many bugs, and get in yer face. And there's no counter benefit to having one if you have a NAT router (aka hardware firewall, by some people)....and a software one.
A hardware (or perimeter) firewall built into a broadband router is going to do absolutely nothing to outbound traffic and, even if it did, it has no possibility to be "application aware".
The only way to have application-level protection is to have a process running on the machine itself which identifies processes attempting to make outbound connections from the machine.
A perimeter firewall (even those with stateful packet inspection and rudimentary intrusion detection) typically looks only at ports and/or protocols for determining what is and is not allowed through.
The Windows Firewall does not monitor or block outbound traffic. If naebothernoo wishes to rely on a software firewall alone this will not be the firewall of choice.Softus said:Why on earth not?...(do not use the windows built in firewall)...
No. I try to give my opinions without technobabble. If a poster clearly wants detailed and technical data to answer his/her question I will oblige.Softus said:Is this what you do - issue edicts with no justification or explanation?
I trust this allays your concerns sufficiently.