Whatever the future holds will be dictated by politicians who often have no idea about how things work and are easily influenced by various industry people who may have different agendas. An example of this is the introduction of condensing boilers where much of the performance data was compared with cast iron boilers when low water content 'standard efficiency' was almost as high and had less complications. Certainly condensing technology in oil appliances produced nowhere near the claimed improvements.
Regulation of heating controls has overcomplicated their use for many people and taken away the facility for individual control options.
I don't think low water content SE boilers were particularly close to a condensing boiler efficiency, a large reduction in the flue gas temp would confirm that plus better mixing of gas/air premix adding to savings, I would postulate 10% possibly 15 with cast iron.
What is interesting is how people believe the very act of getting the boiler to condense will result in a huge leap in efficiency again, it cannot. If half the water vapour was collected that would be 4.5% improvement and the plume at the flues indicate a lot of vapour escapes the boiler.
The other problem with low water content was cycling and poor modulation; even with a limited modulated output, nowhere near today's levels, as the output went down to try to match a reduced load the inefficiency increased.