Apple and Parler

[sxturbo]

If you have tuned in to the news this week, you will see images of those 'grown ups' smashing windows, defacing statues and paintings, letting off fire extinguishers, breaking and entering, stealing, defecating in offices and generally showing us what a parler user looks like.

And that was just BLM over the summer.....

 

[sxturbo]

Similar, but much worse. I forgot to mention killing too.

Good ole parler, eh.

Same as BLM then.....

Let's not pretend the left is any better than the right.

Centrist is where the smart people are..

 

[noseall]

Same as BLM then.....

Which high profile president encouraged BLM supporters to riot, murder, steal, vandalise, incite violence?

 

[fillyboy]

If you have tuned in to the news this week, you will see images of those 'grown ups' smashing windows, defacing statues and paintings, letting off fire extinguishers, breaking and entering, stealing, defecating in offices and generally showing us what a parler user looks like.

Off duty policemen and firefighters by all accounts.

Trump impeachment bid gains Republican support as officers investigated over role in Capitol riots (msn.com)

His comments came as investigators attempting to find out the identities of all those who stormed the building revealed that some off-duty police officers and firefighters may have been among them.

Police departments in Virginia and Washington state have placed officers on leave, while they examine whether they took part in unlawful acts while away from work.

And fire departments in Florida and New York City have reported to federal authorities allegations that some of their members may also have been present.

 

[noseall]

Off duty policemen and firefighters by all accounts.

Yes, I've seen them on tele. Gun rights nutters, Q Anon nutters, politicians, congressmen. Rioters, looters and all going to be locked up. Thick as shoite conspiracy believing parler nut jobs.

 

[Deleted member 18243]

If you have tuned in to the news this week, you will see images of those 'grown ups' smashing windows, defacing statues and paintings, letting off fire extinguishers, breaking and entering, stealing, defecating in offices and generally showing us what a parler user looks like.

Trump supporters are peaceful and law-abiding. Law and order is what Trump stands for.

Perhaps the rioters at Capitol Hill were loony-left Antifa followers posing as Trump supporters?

 

[noseall]

Perhaps the rioters at Capitol Hill were loony-left Antifa followers posing as Trump supporters?

That would work if it were not for the FBI, a million cameras verifying trump and Q Anon supporters, that have frequented many Trump rallies in the past. Oh and the arrests have since verified the allegiance of the rioters that invaded the Capitol building.

Bad luck boyo. Your conspiracy theory falls at every hurdle.

 

[^woody^]

Well lets hope that the social sites get regulated to stop them selectively choosing what people are allowed to say, and stifling political debate that the owners or the complainer libtards don't like.

Matt Hancock:
"But there's something else that has changed, which is that social media platforms are making editorial decisions now. That's clear because they're choosing who should and shouldn't have a voice on their platform."

Mr Hancock said that development was likely to have "consequences".

Trump Twitter ban 'raises regulation questions' - Hancock - BBC News

 

[noseall]

Law and order is what Trump stands for.

Unfortunately for you conned Trump fans, the events of last Wednesday has shown Trump for what everyone suspected. He is a lawless fat orange **** with zero respect for law and order.

 

[noseall]

Well lets hope that the social sites get regulated to stop them selectively choosing what people are allowed to say, and stifling political debate that the owners or the complainer libtards don't like.

Matt Hancock:
"But there's something else that has changed, which is that social media platforms are making editorial decisions now. That's clear because they're choosing who should and shouldn't have a voice on their platform."

Mr Hancock said that development was likely to have "consequences".

Trump Twitter ban 'raises regulation questions' - Hancock - BBC News

Trump could always start telling the truth for once.

 

[Deleted member 18243]

That would work if it were not for the FBI, a million cameras verifying trump and Q Anon supporters, that have frequented many Trump rallies in the past. Oh and the arrests have since verified the allegiance of the rioters that invaded the Capitol building.

Bad luck boyo. Your conspiracy theory falls at every hurdle.

Boyo, you have no more idea of what happened than I do. Unless you were there it's all conjecture; and if you believe the mainstream media to the exclusion of all other sources you are foolish.

 

[^woody^]

Trump could always start telling the truth for once.

Do you remember that thing a while ago with the blue and black dress - some people saw different colours?

Well on that basis in your world, half of those who chose a colour would be banned from the social sites.

The dress - Wikipedia

 

[noseall]

Boyo, you have no more idea of what happened than I do.

Yes boyo, I do. I believe it when the FBI investigating a very public and very visible and closely monitored building, put out a statement saying that NO ANTIFA WERE INVOLVED.

 

[noseall]

Do you remember that thing a while ago with the blue and black dress - some people saw different colours?

Well on that basis in your world, half of those who chose a colour would be banned from the social sites.

The dress - Wikipedia

As I said, Trump could always start telling the truth instead of peddling ridiculous and dangerous conspiracy theories.

 

[fillyboy]

Well lets hope that the social sites get regulated to stop them selectively choosing what people are allowed to say, and stifling political debate that the owners or the complainer libtards don't like.

Matt Hancock:
"But there's something else that has changed, which is that social media platforms are making editorial decisions now. That's clear because they're choosing who should and shouldn't have a voice on their platform."

Mr Hancock said that development was likely to have "consequences".

Trump Twitter ban 'raises regulation questions' - Hancock - BBC News

Yes I read that earlier, interesting. Traditionally those sites have defended themselves against allowing al Qaida executions and Lord knows what by claiming to be simply a 'platform' but the action against Trump has changed that, legislation will follow.
Might not be a bad thing, but another nail in the coffin of free speach.