Why didn't Cameron win them back? Are you saying he is less popular than John Major?
well if you know which constituencies they are, we could check, couldn't we?
You do the research, im not interested in feeding your bizarre fantasies..........
It's not a fantasy. David Cameron is less popular than John Major was. He really failed big-time at this election. When the Lib/Lab super-pact is in place then he'll be ousted for letting his ego lose him the election. He so wanted to kick ass in the debate but had his own ass kicked by the wonderful Nick Clegg.
Lib-lab pact has fell to bits
lib-con pact all but sealed
brown resiging.
Conservatives 10million votes 306 seat (up 100 seat)
Labour 8 million votes 258 seat (lost 97 seats)
Libdems 5 miullion votes 59 sets (lost 3 sets)
Brown to resign within 2 hours, Cameron WILL be the next Prime Minister.
So if thats your definition of failure, id be interested to see what success is..................your a brainless idiot, joe, you use defective maths to try and prove a point that is patently fantasy, just face the facts, Cameron won and within 2 hours we WILL inevitably have a Tory Government led by Cameron.
Clegg ****ed himself. He overplayed his hand. He tried to play a game of bluff by talking to Labour in the hope he could go back to Cam and screw more concessions, but it blew up in his face, and now there only one game in town, Camerons, so hes had to go running back tail between legs before that offer vanishes as well.
Cameron COULD now go it alone and run a minority government, because the Lib Dems would never dare vote them down, after all the rhetoric of 'doing the right thing in the national interest'.
Furthermore, it shows what a two faced liar he is, he said before the election he would support whoever won the most votes and seats, then he turns round and talks to Labour behind Camerons back in mid negotiation, a two faced piece of hypocrisy the Tories wont forget for a long time.
Wake up and smell the coffee joe, things happened differently in this reality.