As was said earlier, people will be profiting from this when the aid is spent with them.
I haven't really paid too much attention to the aid aspect of this, other than starting to get sick of people shaking buckets in my direction at every street corner. However, a colleague tells me that a large fraction of the "aid" has been given in the form of interest-free and low-interest loans. So the "beneficiaries" will be paying it back (unless it gets cancelled as so much debt does).
Now, what has happened out there is an absolutely terrible thing. Tragic doesn't begin to explain it. However, I am cynical about the
amount of aid being sent there. The tragedy doesn't come from houses being swept away, it doesn't come from ruined businesses, it comes from loss of life. No amount of money will bring those people back. So, aid will be spent on tangible things, rebuilding houses and infrastructure.
It seems to have become a global competition to see who can be most charitable. But I can imagine how much money would be donated to the UK if our eastern coastline got battered by a North Sea Swell. Unless it was broadcast worldwide on the news 24/7 we would receive s*d all. We would have to bail ourselves out (in both senses of the word!).
One of the real bu**ers is buildings insurance in those countries usually excludes tsunami damage and damage by seawater. So even the few people who bother with insurance there are screwed.