D
Deleted2797112
.
Last edited by a moderator:
Ayanda Capital delivered £160m of unusable face masks - linked to Liz Truss
- Thread starter SirGalahad
- Start date
Sponsored Links
These masks that are proving unsuitable should be returned under the sale of goods act as not suitable for purpose.
They should not be paid for until they have been proven to be up to standards required and any adjustments should be at the cost of the supplier.
If wording similar to this is not in the contract then the contract should not be issued to the supplier.
How many of you guys with your own businesses would sign a contract with a supplier, and pay up front, for goods that were not fit for purpose?
You would at least expect your full money back.
They should not be paid for until they have been proven to be up to standards required and any adjustments should be at the cost of the supplier.
If wording similar to this is not in the contract then the contract should not be issued to the supplier.
How many of you guys with your own businesses would sign a contract with a supplier, and pay up front, for goods that were not fit for purpose?
You would at least expect your full money back.
D
Deleted2797112
.
Last edited by a moderator:
- Joined
- 1 Apr 2016
- Messages
- 13,609
- Reaction score
- 552
- Country
Sale of goods act - does that apply to businesses? I think thats for consumers only.
The Good Law Project were shocked at the loose terms and have begun a Judicial Review. Corruption should be a bipartisan issue and should cut across party lines.
When it's not your money and its going to a friend then you are not likely to get a good outcome for the public.
Sponsored Links
already debunked.
the word "brown" is not racist.
If you had any decency you would make a retraction
