- Joined
- 31 May 2016
- Messages
- 17,083
- Reaction score
- 2,594
- Country
So an 8 and 1.No they don't.
You're wrong, you know it and you wont provide anything back up your argument, because you know it will be shot to peaces.
So an 8 and 1.No they don't.
Different issues I would say.Last month the Guardian reported that Many British Jews have come to see the BBC as “institutionally hostile to Israel”, community leaders have said, as they endorsed a report that concluded the broadcaster had failed to cover the Middle East conflict with impartiality.
They were responding to a report authored by the former BBC executive Danny Cohen and the former governor of the BBC Ruth Deech, which says: “Whenever the corporation is faced with the choice of whose account or narrative to believe, it seldom points in Israel’s direction. For Hamas in this war, proof is rarely necessary. For the IDF and Israel, proof is rarely enough.”
I don't think that's true, but Israel does itself no favours in banning the BBC and other accredited news organisations from reporting in Gaza or the West Bank where daily attacks are carried out.
It's not though, it's another example of a niche special interest group disagreeing with the BBC editorial coverage and deciding that they're (unfairly) biased against them.Different issues I would say.
A 1 then.You're wrong
you wont provide anything back up your argument, because you know it will be shot to peaces.
Well, the thread is about the BBC so it's all on topic, really.Different issues I would say.
a 9 from you.A 1 then.
Which bit don't you understand?
Stirring hatred towards Zionists is not protected, because they meet the definition of a race, in the public order act, particularly using the above example.
No I'm saying the two issues are different.Well, the thread is about the BBC so it's all on topic, really.
He now believes some made up rules are to be followed as well. He's easily led.I understand perfectly that you are unable to quote a sentence or paragraph that supports your false claim.
Because there isn't one.
How do you expect accurate reporting on any issue if a government bans the BeeB? Israel is trying to control the narrative - people like you distort the narrative - and organisations like the BeeB take flak for not being as impartial as Jews would like. They've been long accustomed to having their cake that they can't take legitimate criticism of their government.No I'm saying the two issues are different.
1 arguing they are bias
2 banning them from the war zone.
different issues, not different issues to the thread.