BBC news Black out

[motorbiking]

And some don't think hatred is being stirred. You are not judge and jury.

threatening, abusive and insulting have their ordinary meanings.

 

[denso13]

threatening, abusive and insulting have their ordinary meanings.

So does criticism.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

The BBC has many faults.

I don't think you can throw racial hatred at it

 

[Odds]

Reckon mr. mtrbkng should be reported for animal abuse - he's flogged the cr*p outta that horse by now.

 

[Nwgs2]

.

 

[motorbiking]

So does criticism.

Please quote the case law that backs this up

 

[JohnD]

In this Part “racial hatred” means hatred against a group of persons defined by reference to colour, race, nationality (including citizenship) or ethnic or national origins.

There is no "definition of a race."

There is no mention of criticising the actions of a state. Or a political movement. And no mention of criticising racism, apartheid or genocide.

there is no "definition of a race" in the text you pasted.

the definition of a race, in the public order act

I've provided links to the source many times..v

You have failed to show a sentence or paragraph saying what you falsely claimed.

Stirring hatred towards Zionists is not protected, because they meet the definition of a race, in the public order act, particularly using the above example.

No they don't.

 

[ReganAndCarter]

I don't think you can throw racial hatred at it

Except maybe hatred of the white indigenous.

Think of an organisation crammed with educated Noseall types, full of self loathing and desperate to demonstrate their womens' libber sympathies.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Except maybe hatred of the white indigenous.

Where ? When ?

 

[ReganAndCarter]

Where ? When ?

Everywhere. All the time.

Haven't you noticed the news, current affairs, programmes in general. Stuffed with unrepresentative percentage of ethnics - mostly female. Even token blind people or those in wheelchairs.

 

[carmanmemoranda]

Everywhere. All the time.

Haven't you noticed the news, current affairs, programmes in general. Stuffed with unrepresentative percentage of ethnics - mostly female. Even token blind people or those in wheelchairs.

So you judge people by those standards, not on whether they can do the job or not?

But black, white, blind or female, any hatred of white indigenous (whatever that is/was) that you can point to?

 

[ReganAndCarter]

So you judge people by those standards, not on whether they can do the job or not?

Not me employing them. Down to BBC, C4, etc. If you haven't noticed the feminisation and black out of presenters these days you can't be watching much tv. If there are any quotas, they've gone way beyond.

Similar to affirmative action in South Africa since 90s. All about the black man for the job, not necessarily the right man.

Even the world of comedy is at it. Eg. Rosie Jones. Barely able to be understood and when you can about as funny as a dose of herpes. But she ticks a few boxes, so she's pushed onto prime time tv.

 

[JohnD]

Please quote the case law that backs this up

You first.

Stirring hatred towards Zionists is not protected, because they meet the definition of a race, in the public order act, particularly using the above example.

No they don't.

 

[motorbiking]

There is no "definition of a race."

There is no mention of criticising the actions of a state. Or a political movement. And no mention of criticising racism, apartheid or genocide.

there is no "definition of a race" in the text you pasted.





You have failed to show a sentence or paragraph saying what you falsely claimed.






No they don't.

Only in your head.

 

[JohnD]

I'm not the one pretending English law says something it doesn't.