Beginning of the end for the Saxe Coburgs?

E

ellal

Joined
23 May 2004
Messages
16,204
Reaction score
779
Country
United Kingdom
Can they survive this one?

The media will be like a dog with an endless supply of bones on this one!

How can they carry on with their duties as normal with all those questions about an alleged 'pedo guy' in their midst being bandied about?

Let the queen snuff it and then kick out the biggest immigrant benefit scrounging family in the country back to from whence they came!

Cushion the blow with £100m that they can fight it out between themselves about.

And we can then take back control of the billions that have historically been purloined from this country - a real bargain!
 
Sponsored Links
ellal said:
Can they survive this one?

The media will be like a dog with an endless supply of bones on this one!

How can they carry on with their duties as normal with all those questions about an alleged 'pedo guy' in their midst being bandied about?

Let the queen snuff it and then kick out the biggest immigrant benefit scrounging family in the country back to from whence they came!

Cushion the blow with £100m that they can fight it out between themselves about.

And we can then take back control of the billions that have historically been purloined from this country - a real bargain!
Click to expand...


Lets just kick out you republican parasites.
Problem solved.
Back from whence you came. What ever sheet hole that might be.
And we can take back control.
 
Ryler said:
Lets just kick out you republican parasites.
Problem solved.
Back from whence you came. What ever sheet hole that might be.
And we can take back control.
Click to expand...
Why not kick them out back whence (not from whence) they came?
They are the true parasites.

Do you enjoy being a serf so much?
 
To be accurate, I don't think Epsteen - nor Andrew - has actually been accused of being a 'paedophile'.

I do wish people would not use such terms when they do not apply.
 
Sponsored Links
Its not the begining of the end, Edward will be seen as one bad egg.

William and Kate + Harry and Meghan are pretty popular.

And more importantly the Royals are at the top of a very big privilege tree, the ones lower down dont want the head cut off.
 
EFLImpudence said:
To be accurate, I don't think Epsteen - nor Andrew - has actually been accused of being a 'paedophile'.

I do wish people would not use such terms when they do not apply.
Click to expand...
Epstein was a convicted paedophile!

And whatever Andrew has or hasn't done, he is forever tainted because of his relationship with Epstein.
True or not, his 'explanations' were laughable.
Although I admit there was one bit that was totally plausible. That he had 'never bought a drink' - he's a parasitic freeloader!

But slowly the true privilege (and more importantly the abuse of that privilege) of the royal family as a whole is being revealed.
It's a drip drip process, but this affair has turned the tap on a bit harder!
 
ellal said:
.....slowly the true privilege (and more importantly the abuse of that privilege) of the royal family as a whole is being revealed.
It's a drip drip process, but this affair has turned the tap on a bit harder!
Click to expand...

Hark, the Queen has spoken! You obviously have a hatred for all things British so out of interest, can you tell us what country both you and your partner come from?

I’m giving odds of 1/15 on a non answer and evens for a locked thread.
 
Last edited:
If Corbyn gets in, that might be it for the Royals. We'll be able to funnel all that cash into our schools and hospitals instead.

But, at the moment nobody has publicly come forward to say that when they were underage the prince slept with them. He has his arm around a 17 year old - it means nothing really, and if they had consensual sex, that is legal.

The only issue really is whether he knew what Epstein was up to (if he was a paedophile, and not just liking 17 year olds) and kept quiet about it, in return for business / deals money opportunities etc.
 
jonbey said:
But, at the moment nobody has publicly come forward to say that when they were underage the prince slept with them. He has his arm around a 17 year old - it means nothing really, and if they had consensual sex, that is legal.
Click to expand...
The 'consensual' part is being challenged, as the victim is claiming she was 'forced' to have sex with him.
Thus he would have been having sex with a 'trafficked' person.

jonbey said:
The only issue really is whether he knew what Epstein was up to (if he was a paedophile, and not just liking 17 year olds) and kept quiet about it, in return for business / deals money opportunities etc.
Click to expand...
That would be collusion, and should also be investigated.

In relation to that, I wonder what will 'befall' his good friend Ghislaine Maxwell?

The apples sure didn't fall far from the tree in that family!
 
jonbey said:
f Corbyn gets in, that might be it for the Royals. We'll be able to funnel all that cash into our schools and hospitals instead.
Click to expand...

Corbyn cant beat the establishment, he has no chance.(he wont win the election anyway).

There is a reason why half of the land in this country is owned by less than 1% .......the system is designed to keep it that way.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Sponsored Links
Back
Top