If they were women going shopping, my one trip would be going in the exact opposite direction, funnily enough.
If they were women going shopping, my one trip would be going in the exact opposite direction, funnily enough.
Of course I saw it. That's why I pointed out the error in your answer.Did you not notice my use of the abbreviation.....etc..............
Your scenario, which I fully understood without you having to write it all out, only ever places two people at the destination. This is why it's no different to taking only two people, and that result in a total of 50 miles.Take A............................................5 miles
Come back .....................................5 miles
Take B, bring back A........................10miles
Take C, bring back B........................10 miles
Take D, bring back C........................10 miles
Go back to get D and come back......10 miles
Agreed. I misread the "and back" as relating to the trip distance. However, given that we'd have left them doing whatever it was and gone off for a blat, it would probably be far in excess of 70 miles by the time that they were brought back to the start .I wasn't you know, 'cos I didn't notice the "and back".He's right you know...!
The correct total is 70 miles.
ok and the point is what, never mind joe he's a puppet.
positioning?
you dont see that except the poor police positioning
oh and dont use the word Biker, if you dont mind, that was a thrill seeking rocket pilot out for a jolly dont call him a Biker.
I didnt see any 'poor police positioning'
If you make enough trips so that four people are at the destination all together, then it results in a total of 70 miles.
No: he moved over to the wrong side, in order to see round the bend earlier than he would by staying on the left.
If you notice, it's done in such a way that would enable him to move back in if something was coming the other way, without being a danger. If nothing is coming, the radius of the line he is taking is greater, which means he can toe it faster around the bend.
It's called Advanced Driving...if you ever get the opportunity to go out on a jolly with a Class One driver, do so. Listen to the running commentary, he will be talking about things he's seeing and taking into account that you wouldn't be seeing in a month of Sundays.
If you look carefully, you can see the entire length of the short stretch from that short right hander to the next left bend, even allowing for the hedge on the right.
Good call I would say, set him up on the right line for the next left hander, minimum risk to oncoming. Meantime, the biker's positioning was pants...
Maybe some of our serving and ex plod posters would like to comment?
See Snic, I did take note on my plod safe rider course (and IAM days out with plod) .
I was blown away by the running commentary one class one driver did in a demo run: he was seeing and talking about stuff that I hadn't - and I was just a passenger in the car with nothing else to concentrate on. The plod on my Safe Bike course were also brilliant, wanging around corners far faster than I would have dared do if I'd not been behind him to see how fast I could take it - and no hanging off the seat, knee down, anything like that. Just smooth and progressive.
I've passed IAM bike and car and got RoSPA Silver for the car, so I like to think I'm a bit better with my observation and road use than a lot of drivers, but the plod drivers/riders made me feel like a complete novice. Awesome.
Seriously folks, if you ever get a chance for a jolly in a jam sandwich, it's well worth doing. You might also gain a bit more faith in them actually knowing what they are doing at those speeds.
Can I claim my tenner now Snico