Bill Gates- Again

[Odds]

Hardly the same context now is it.

One man's fact is another man's opinion.
Deal with it.

 

[Deleted member 221031]

One man's fact is another man's opinion.
Deal with it.

No need to be petulant.

 

[Odds]

 

[denso13]

Is forbes a respected publication

Better going to the source, Kodama Systems. They are proposing the thinning out of forests and removing unwanted/overgrow/dying trees.

Bill Gates has invested money in the company. That's a far cry from claiming Bill Gates is pushing a plan to chop down 70 million acres of forest.

 

[Brigadier]

.... removing unwanted/overgrow/dying trees.

There's a whole ecosystem right there, just swept away.

 

[Odds]

There's a whole ecosystem right there, just swept away.

It won't take long for the ground to recover and replenish the forest. A whole new ecosystem will thrive under good Forestry management.

 

[gas112]

Bill Gates has invested money in the company. That's a far cry from claiming Bill Gates is pushing a plan to chop down 70 million acres of forest.

What are you saying bill gates doesnt know how his investment is being spent ?

 

[carmanmemoranda]

What are you saying bill gates doesnt know how his investment is being spent ?

You understand the difference between investing in a company and directing it?

 

[Brigadier]

It won't take long for the ground to recover and replenish the forest. A whole new ecosystem will thrive under good Forestry management.

It won't take long for something to recolonise the ground, that's true.


Just scour this, and think of the lovely stuff that could grow in its place............

 

[denso13]

What are you saying bill gates doesnt know how his investment is being spent ?

No.

 

[gas112]

You understand the difference between investing in a company and directing it?

You understand what your investing in before parting with millions of dollars of your money so that you dont invest in something against your ethics. Quite a common investment method , ethical investments

 

[Dork Lard]

"The carbon removal credits generated from the avoided emissions will be sold into the voluntary carbon market to generate cash flows that can be used to cover project costs and/or repay investors".

 

[Notch7]

I’m

It’s been established in previous threads. Fact checker is just an opinion.

It doesn’t matter whether it’s been mentioned in previous threads

And no, fact checkers are not necessarily simply opinion, if research shows that information on a fact checker site is supported across a range of trusted sources, it is a good indication that the fact checker contains fact.


You have provided no supporting evidence for the website or article you posted - yet you dismiss a fact checkper without evidence.

 

[Notch7]

Chop Down Forests To Save The Planet? Maybe Not As Crazy As It Sounds

Kodama Systems is betting it can reduce carbon dioxide in the air by chopping down and burying trees. Now if only Uncle Sam would get on board with tax credits, too.

www.forbes.com

Is forbes a respected publication

It paywalled, so we can’t read the article.

my evidence stands: it is dead trees they are going to bury.

 

[Notch7]

So if Zuc says fact checker is just an opinion, who are we to argue

I can argue, because it is only his opinion.