In the article the term used is ''likely'. When has proof stopped being important ?
what ??
likely that "some one" has used chemical weapons in Syria ?? now and or in the past ?
A good while back ?? afaik the Russians put out a statement saying that Syria had destroyed all its chemical weapons ?? ( unlikely)
But were not really gonna get a proper Brexit are we. The door is being left open, innit.
Mothercare is the latest casualty and these retail outlets are just the tip and we haven't had the real thing yet.
Roll on Brexit!
Mostly. The fall in the pound has tipped 'em over.But aren't all retailers suffering because of the internet?
Losing.So what are remoaners moaning about?
Don't you think it stinks of agent provocateur ?
this could all get out of hand tbh . to many players , all with there own agenda are involved
Iran
Israel who have concerns about Iran & seem to be aligning with the Saudis who also have concerns with iran
Turkey who seem to be getting ever closer to the Russians
Russians , with out who's help Assad may well have been toppled
Hezbolah from the Lebanon
USA
All = a S*** sandwich & possible military confrontation between the US & the Russians so what ever military force is used by the US will be proportionate & a token gesture ,so it will be a waste of time
imho they should stick a few 100 cruise missiles onto Assads palace residence that may get his attention hit the main Russian military base with a missile salvo
either that or just mind our own bussiness