Why 'let the bodies pile high in their thousands' was taken out of context: a Telegraph writer explains (thedailymash.co.uk)
Why 'let the bodies pile high in their thousands' was taken out of context: a Telegraph writer explains
26th April 2021
FOOLISH enough to believe that the prime minister’s bodies quote shows him in a bad light? Daily Telegraph writer Denys Finch Hatton explains how it’s all about context:
Just because I’m a lifelong Conservative doesn’t mean I’ll always give Johnson a free pass, but on this occasion his hilarious quip about sacrificing thousands has clearly been misinterpreted to make him look bad.
I’m sure if we could hear Johnson’s words in context he was probably talking about lots of happy, healthy bodies piled high in a beer-fuelled human pyramid of jolly hijinks. Any other interpretation would be grossly manipulative.
We’ve seen the opposition do this time and again in an attempt to tarnish Johnson’s immaculate image. Like the time he said ‘f**k business’ as a joke. Has that statement been borne out by his later actions? Exactly.
So I’m not in the least surprised to see this kind of grossly slanted reporting appear in the Daily Mail, a left-wing rag always looking to do the prime minister and government down.
Sadly, unless evidence of the conversation surfaces, our only course of action is to assume anything that pictures the PM in the best possible light.
Defence minister Ben Wallace is absolutely right to call this a ‘comedy chapter’. I for one am splitting my sides.
How lucky we are to have such a sublime joker of a leader keeping our spirits up through the pandemic. We’ll look back and laugh.
Quite right fillyboy, just like Boris's comment about "rather be lying dead in a ditch" wasn't said by Boris, nor his quip about "lying down in front of bulldozers".
We all know how Boris uses exaggerated metaphors. It's just his overuse of flowery language, he doesn't really mean what he says, and we all know that.
I mean, he said there wouldn't be any borders in the Irish sea, but we know he didn't really mean that.
He said there wouldn't be any additional paperwork for trade between GB and NI, but we know he didn't mean that.
He signed an Agreement which he had no intention of honouring, because he didn't really mean to sign it.
He said there would be an additional £350M for the NHS, but we know he didn't really mean that.
He told the Queen that he could prorogue Parliament, but we know he didn't really mean that.
He said there would be enough customs officers to control the borders, that wouldn't be there anyway, but we know he didn't really mean that.
He promised his wife to love her until death, but we know he didn't really mean that.
He promised his mistresses that he'd look after their child, but we know he didn't really mean that.
Now the rest of the cabinet are having to commit perjury to cover up Boris's comments that he didn't really mean anyway.
Just how bad has UK politics become when the rest of the cabinet have to resort to blatant lies to protect the lying cheating PM.
Even Boris is having to deny he said the things he said, because he didn't really mean to say what he said.