.
No, it's just an incompetent way to do it. The income threshold for free school meals has been stuck at £7400 since 2018 and it's not set to rise. We've had something like 16% of inflation. Since then, something like 110,000 more kids should qualify for fsm but don't, because incomes crept over the threshold. You have to earn something over £3k to cover school meals. (iirc - that may have been for
2 kids)
Benefits are not just for the unemployed, 40% of those on UC are employed. When they work out the UC, why isn't school meal allowance put in there?
(I haven't rechecked the numbers, these are just what my memory tells me. You get the point anyway, it' a bad method.)
Kids are turning up at school not having had a breakfast, and/or not with a vaguely adequate lunch.
Now, (he said, warming to his theme) are these parents really that poor, or are they just incompetent to bring kids up?
100g of porridge oats is 13p. Whole milk, 70p/litre, cheap eggs 12p each.
Brekky well under 50p. Including cooking. Three for near a quid.
Questions are obvious. Maybe parents need educating - they don't get training?