- Joined
- 26 Sep 2016
- Messages
- 432
- Reaction score
- 70
- Country
Talking of damp HT electrics I well remember putting condoms on the distributor cap of a Renault 5 to keep it dry.
I had a K reg 214. Probably the worst car I have ever owned. The difference between the car in the newspaper article and my 214 is that the former's engine was built by a highly trained and skilled Japanese workforce to Japanese production standards. The 214 engine was built by a drooling, gibbering muppet at Longbridge.The old Rover 200 with the Honda running gear lasted well, the one linked has been saved, it has nearly 400,000 miles under its belt!
https://www.derbytelegraph.co.uk/ne...eads-rescue-ancient-vintage-rover-4521537.amp
Next big rainstorm, wait till it's dark, wind down all the windows, switch off the lights, heater and wipers and go for a drive. Stop at every traffic lights and throw a twenty quid note out of the window. It's not exactly the same, but it's really close to the 'owning a Leyland car' experience.
I thankyou.....and goodnight......
saab refused to bow to gm pressure to build crap . when their backs were turned saab continued to plow money into quality and gm pulled the plug.The headteacher of my grammar school always drove Saabs. They were considered a luxury car back in the 70's. Beautifully made and very reliable. They didn't go rusty because as also with Volvos, Sweden has large reserves of iron ore and produces high grade steel. A lot of cars until twenty years ago....not just Leylands and Fords....but Fiats, Lancias etc. used panels produced from melted down scrap.
Things went wrong for Saab when they were taken over by General Motors.
Things went wrong for Saab when they were taken over by General Motors.
They still do and have done for a very long time. Recycled steel is every bit as good good as "new" steel.A lot of cars until twenty years ago....not just Leylands and Fords....but Fiats, Lancias etc. used panels produced from melted down scrap.
like many other manufacturers. but gm blocked a chinese buyout iirc that put the final nail in.That's not really true. They had been scraping along on the edge of financial disaster for a long time beforehand.
They still do and have done for a very long time. Recycled steel is every bit as good good as "new" steel.
Steel, aluminium and many other metals can be recycled many times and produce a very high quality product.
I can remember the urban myth from fifty years ago that American cars were cr@p because they were made from recycled tin cans.
That has more to do with the coating and protection given to the steel that the quality of the steel itself.So what has changed between the 60's and 70's steel and the modern steel which doesn't start rusting the moment a car comes out of the show room?
I read that they recover steel from sunken ships of around that time, simply for the quality of the steel which is not recycled.
I have read that it is particularly valuable as it was produced before the era of atmospheric atomic-bomb tests and is therefore uncontaminated by radiation.There are apparently numerous applications where this is of great importance and worth great expense.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Low-background_steel