But by the way you 'interpret' the info, it may then, by your own admission, not necessarily be correct ?
Of course it could be incorrect, but it's based on reading the legislation, not on hearsay. By all means disagree with it - I have no problem with a civilised and reasoned discussion about the merits of different interpretations.
The way that electrical installation is going, even with what most people would call a 'simple' component replacement, it will require either an inspection by a competent person
What?! I've no idea what kind of barometer of progress you're using there, so why do you think that the legislation is heading in that direction?
I understand what you said in your thread, but from what I've read, and heard from various qualified electricians, inspection by a qualified person is a necessary requirement on most domestic matters.
Maybe I'm wrong though.......
Well I can't tell, because you haven't said what you've read, and you haven't quoted verbatim what you've heard and why you think what you've heard might be authoritative.
Electricians gossip just as much as the next person, and Part P has been a huge bone of contention because it has had the effect of outlawing people who consider themselves qualified by virtue of experience. Some of those people are justifiably, or unjustifiably, irked, so their viewpoint is tainted by that emotion. Some of those who register for Part P certification feel considerable pain at the expense of doing so, others less so. If you ask people in the former category you're likely to get a cynical forecast of the future.
The future doesn't matter - only
now matters. You can't break the law if it hasn't been made yet, and you can't act legally unless you stick to the law as it is now.
If you're in any doubt about the interpretation of the need to notify the like-for-like replacement of faulty/broken components, then just imagine whether or not the intent of that part of the law was to require notification of the replacement of every single accessory, fixed appliance, lampholder, and ceiling rose. Competent and safe work is one thing, but you have to ask yourself one question: do you really consider it very likely that the government intended for all that to be reported?
Well, crockett, do ya?