Far from being "the safest on several counts" our plugs are integral components of a system which is unsound, and which the Wiring Regulations should deprecate.
I have met many electricians in many countries ( factory control systems ) and while their first comments about the UK system are often a bit negative on the size of the plug they almost always see the advantages of the fuse per appliance for safety and conveniance to user and installer once the system is explained to them.
With any real-world size of flex, I agree with that, but only if one makes the assumption (as BS7671 generally does) that all faults are necessarily of negligible impedance. As you know, I am uneasy about that notion. Although undoubtedly rare, there are possible failure modes of some equipment that will result in faults which are not of negligible impedance, hence currents which, although excessive, are far less than that required for operation of the magnetic trip of a B16.
Many people here are quick to criticise/condemn (as dangerous) imported adapters, plugs, leads etc. which contain no fuse, even though a B32 probably provides adequate protection for any size of flex against faults of negligible impedance.
So are you saying there is a regulation which allows a circuit to have cable rated at lower amperage than the amperage at which the circuit protection operates ?.
I fully accept that an idiot ( or ignorant person ) could wire a 2 kilowatt heater with 5 amp flex but no system is fool proof when in the un-supervised public domain ( aka domestic DIY electrical work ).
I have seen photos of a house fire where the cause was determined to have been thin flex from a 15 amp ( un-fused ) plug. The flex was under a carpet igniting the carpet. Had that had a five amp fuse in a 13 amp plug then the chance of the carpet being set on fire would have been reduced.
Plugs should be sold with out fuses fitted or with a 3 amp fitted.
In terms of regulations, you're probably right - but regs are not everything. I wouldn't mind betting that a good, quite probably high, proportion of casualties and fires attributed to electricity arise in relation to installations which are essentially compliant with the regulations.
So are you saying there is a regulation which allows a circuit to have cable rated at lower amperage than the amperage at which the circuit protection operates ?.
Effectively there is, but only because the regs essentially regard anything other than a dead short as being an 'overload', rather than a 'fault', and do allow protection against overload (but not against 'fault') to be omitted in certain circumstances. However,a s both you and I have pointed out, it is possible to have a 'fault' (everyday sense) which is not of negligible impedance.
So are you saying there is a regulation which allows a circuit to have cable rated at lower amperage than the amperage at which the circuit protection operates ?.
So are you saying there is a regulation which allows a circuit to have cable rated at lower amperage than the amperage at which the circuit protection operates ?.
Indeed - but this line of thought can be taken to apparently absurd lengths. What about a 1.5mm² dedicated circuit supply just one socket and protected by, say, a B50 MCB?
That only seems unreasonable because you have written "apparently absurd lengths".
The socket will have a 13A fused plug inserted into it therefore the cable is protected - at a point other than the point of reduction in csa.
However, That is not really what we are discussing.
It is not the same as an unfused plug with a small flex.
The recent thread to which Simon referred was one where he asked about the continental practice of 16A circuits and unfused plugs and small flex.
As long as the flex can cope with the fault current until the opd operates then it would comply here - if unfused plugs were allowed.
Indeed - but this line of thought can be taken to apparently absurd lengths. What about a 1.5mm² dedicated circuit supply just one socket and protected by, say, a B50 MCB?
Read what Bernard asked, again. It really does seem as if he is unaware (and possibly finds it hard to credit) that there is a regulation which allows a circuit to have cable rated at lower amperage than the amperage at which the circuit protection operates. It really does seem as if he is unaware of that basic principle ever being allowed.
I wanted to know if he had ever heard of spurs wired from 32A ring finals using 2.5mm² T/E.
Indeed - but this line of thought can be taken to apparently absurd lengths. What about a 1.5mm² dedicated circuit supply just one socket and protected by, say, a B50 MCB?
That only seems unreasonable because you have written "apparently absurd lengths". The socket will have a 13A fused plug inserted into it therefore the cable is protected - at a point other than the point of reduction in csa. However, That is not really what we are discussing. It is not the same as an unfused plug with a small flex.
Fair enough - I perhaps should not have used the word 'absurd'; maybe something like 'surprising' would have been better. However, I do think it's essentially the same concept that we're discussing - namely using a device to protect cables only against (negligible impedence) 'faults', and relying on the fact that the fixed/single load precludes any 'overload' situation.
It is, at least to me, 'surprising' because it flies in the face of normal practices. If I understand correctly what's being said, then we might as well use 50A MCBs for all circuits (including lighting, immersions etc.) other than those supplying multiple sockets (and maybe get a good price for bulk-buying B50s!). Are you saying that (given an appropriate Ze) you would have no problem (e.g. when doing an EICR) with a lighting or immersion circuit being protected by a B50?
Yes I have heard of them and have installed such to single sockets where the maximum load that could be taken from the socket is 13 amp and thus less than the safe continuous current that 2.5 mm² can carry.
A spur to a double socket is ( in my opinion ) at a maximum of 26 amps is border line.
Fair enough - I perhaps should not have used the word 'absurd'; maybe something like 'surprising' would have been better. However, I do think it's essentially the same concept that we're discussing - namely using a device to protect cables only against (negligible impedence) 'faults', and relying on the fact that the fixed/single load precludes any 'overload' situation.
A lighting circuit could quite easily be overloaded - especially these days - and the Zs would be a problem with 1mm² cable.
So, not lighting.
Immersions, I suppose, would be alright if it were allowed (see below) but what would be the point?
You are forgetting a couple of things.
There is the three metre rule and the reason for the omission of opd protection. Namely, it is only advantageous when the csa of a larger circuit is to be reduced, for whatever reason, and fitting an opd at that point would be a nuisance and pointless because the smaller cable cannot be overloaded.
Is that not because such spurs are specifically 'dispensated'? If one relied on the regs in general, wouldn't the length of an unfused spur be limited to 3m?
Surely not if it were designed satisfactorily in the first place? ... and as for 'especially these days', haven't we been moving in the direction of much smaller lighting loads?
Possibly/probably. I did qualify my statement by saying that one would need an acceptable Zs. With a small circuit and 1.5mm² cable, I would have thought that it could well be possible, though.
...and the reason for the omission of opd protection. Namely, it is only advantageous when the csa of a larger circuit is to be reduced, for whatever reason, and fitting an opd at that point would be a nuisance and pointless because the smaller cable cannot be overloaded.
Yes, but what started all this was the discussion about a situation in which there was no fuse in the plug, hence a thin flex from plug to appliance would not be benefitting from adequate overload protection from anything.
If you need to find a tradesperson to get your job done, please try our local search below,
or if you are doing it yourself you can find suppliers local to you.
Select the supplier or trade you require, enter your location to begin your search.
Please select a service and enter a location to continue...
Are you a trade or supplier? You can create your listing free at DIYnot Local