E
EddieM
Do you drink alcohol?
Would you take cancer drugs?
Both alter DNA
Huh? You mean in the same way that bleach alters your DNA?
Do you drink alcohol?
Would you take cancer drugs?
Both alter DNA
Liar liar pants on fire.Normal vaccines have always taken anywhere between 7 to 20 years from conception to market, because that's how long it takes to do the trials and see the effects.
With comments like that, I could accurately call you illiterate.Had this at the butchers last week and the Kebab shop in thd old town.
I'm reluctant yo use these know if they are only taking cash. How much of that does the tax man see.
I'm expecting Bobby yo be along soon calling me a racist.
What do you think is the current average life span?Do we wait for 20 years when most people are dead. That would back up your conspiracy.
Some of the Republican states in America are declaring themselves open and ending the restrictions
And you are qualified to make that judgement I suppose
Can we PLEASE have Sooey Free society,
Why do you consider that utter bolux?Yes, because scientific journals and all of the scientific community says he spouts bolox.
Here is an example of Colemans bolox:
"The theory behind social distancing is that it will protect people from other folk who sneeze or cough.
But I think that whoever thought it up is a cretin. And I think the people who have implemented social distancing are also cretins. Not just because they didn’t think through the social or economic implications but because a sneeze doesn’t stop at six feet. And nor does a cough.
A cough can spread droplets for 18 feet. And a sneeze can travel 24 feet.
So if we are going to have social distancing they’ve got the bloody distance wrong.
It has to be at least 24 feet. Really, it ought to be 30 feet to be safe."
His argument is built on logical fallacies: notably appeal to extremes.
He is saying: "if you can't be 30 feet apart, it's pointless"..... which is utter bolox.
Why do you consider that utter bolux?
It is totally consistent with the later advice regarding dispersal and outside in the wind and leave a window open so the virus can escape.
I only have one-way windows.
Punish anyone who is brave enough to speak out against the mainstream agenda
It's wrong in premise, the social distancing guidelines are to reduce the risk from normal conversation, not to prevent the risk from someone sneezing. If they're sneezing then they should be somewhere else entirely. And wearing a mask that would dramatically reduce expectorant.Why do you consider that utter bolux?
It is totally consistent with the later advice regarding dispersal and outside in the wind and leave a window open so the virus can escape.
I only have one-way windows.
Reposted, but it should be obvious why a fart, or a Covid-19 positive person walking past a window is less risky than sealing yourself in with farts or Covid-19 virii.Think about it as a lethal fart. In an enclosed space that is pretty bad, but once it's wafted out a window then it quickly gets faint enough to be undetectable.
the mainstream agenda