By implication, you did, because you said that it was conventional.I never said this was common practice
You're still wrong. It couldn't get into the primary circuit the way that you're describing it.I merely stated that this was a way that an additive could have been introduced into the hot water system via a radiator purely from the way that I, personally have seen some heating systems installed on more than one occasion.
I'm not upset at all. I'm very happy pointing out that you're wrong.I don`t understand how that statement has caused you so much upset?
If that's a question, then the answer is yes, or no, depending on how you interpret your appalling grammar.You haven`t seen a heating system piped up in this way?
Only "probably"? Is your certainty wavering, perchance?A mistake? Things change know all, it probably seemed a good idea at the time.
I might be a woman.It`s obviously a lot more than you have seen, fellah
Please see above, and above that, and above that....How was my advice misleading
Ditto.you explain to me given the scenario I have put forward, regarding the additive entering the hot water system via the central heating system, where my advice was misleading?
It means that you're confused, or that you haven't read the first page of the topic.I think you were later than me. What does that mean?I note that you were the latecomer to this topic, and that you are the one who isn't "with the programme".
Wrong about the facts, and wrong about your analysis. Oh, and wrong about me. Just generally wrong, really.Wrong about what exactly?I've stated that you're wrong, which you clearly are, and you've refuted it,
Again, please see above.If I`m wrong, tell me what it is and I`ll thank you for the information, so let`s all hear what it is I`m wrong about?
You're going to need a JCB if you dig any deeper.I think you are the Charlatan.