Not an attack, as such, but after you wrote:
It appeared you were asking me to justify the National Review even though the point of my post was that we don't know what to believe.
and then:Is there reason to believe https://www.nationalreview.com/ is a more reliable source than those we have seen saying the opposite?
It might be useful to decide what assumptions (if any) we should make.
For example, I hesitate to believe anyone who asserts that it wasn't raining
It appeared you were asking me to justify the National Review even though the point of my post was that we don't know what to believe.