- Joined
- 22 Jan 2007
- Messages
- 17,578
- Reaction score
- 2,414
- Country
No it doesn't.Peer reviewed, just means agreed upon by someone with the same opinion. Nothing more, nothing less.
Says it all really.It’s worthless and you should know that
No it doesn't.Peer reviewed, just means agreed upon by someone with the same opinion. Nothing more, nothing less.
Says it all really.It’s worthless and you should know that
I asked you what causes sea level to rise.Do you think that melting sea ice increases the sea level -- yes or no. I am telling you that melting sea ice does not raise the sea level.
So you believe the lies, myths and misinformation formation in the film thenGood film, some interesting assertions backed up with data. I was a bit of a sceptic before watching it, probably slightly more so now.
NWGS doesn't know the difference between radiation sickness and a virusWomble can’t answer yes or no. He just tells lies
Oh you are all cleaver now I have showed you what to read but none of that is what your were contesting/ asking was it - you were querying the statement of 23% which you were doubting. And the link to the Milankovitch Cycles was nothing to do with the conversation about current rapid warming so why are you trying to link it to it.It states there are possibly small changes in radiation levels striking the Earth, affecting modest changes over tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of years.
Absolutely nothing to do with the rapid climate change currently being experienced on Earth. The reason climate scientists have ignored your magic bean theory, is because they could not stop laughing long enough to read your email address.
We are still learning about our nearest star and the 11 year is not the only cycle it has.
Not to mention the earths 100,000 year cycle around the Sun with a 23 percent difference in the incoming solar radiation.
So it's just how much is man affecting it.Certainly contributing to pollution and having an effect on earths finite resources which I think needs looking at. Whether that would change the climate is open to speculation.
All we seem to be doing now is using carbon credit scams to shift the dirty stuff to emerging countries like India and China.
So it's just how much man is contributing.Absolutely - the sensible and scientific approach is to consider all possibilities and not rule out any based on what we guess or imagine might be the case. Bearing in mind that the consequences of being wrong here could mean vast sums of money being squandered and other adverse consequences.
Are you asking me to guess?
Even if I guess that it seems likely, then that leaves us with: how much and does it matter?
Are we at a stage with this whetr we really want to hand over billions to bent and incompetent politicians to fix what might not be broken.
So man is contributing.Yes man is making it worse --- by a tiny tiny amount which has been exaggerated and weaponised in order to use as a vehicle to tax us more. I would believe governments more if they said - "You know what man made climate change is a disaster so if you do x y or z then you will pay less tax for doing the right thing" but instead they make us pay ever more tax.
So you believe the lies, myths and misinformation formation in the film then
You are deflecting,I asked you what causes sea level to rise.
It seems you don't know
You poor thing
Notch said ---The other thing that makes me laugh is when the BBC show sea ice breaking up and melting and say its rising the sea levels and dumb idiots believe it.
This sounds like you think it does.what causes rising sea levels then
Read it again I didn't say I agree it's due to many made climate change, I left that side open.So it's just how much is man affecting it.
I agree, man is affecting climate change, so we need to do something about it.
Took you a while but you got there
Just read the link I provided and edgucate yourself
Do you believe that man produced Co2 is the cause of global warming or climate change.So man is contributing.
How do you know by a tiny tiny amount ?
What should we do about it?
Not the same as saying man isn't responsible at all is it
You have shown me an interesting article that has absolutely nothing to do with climate change. Well done you!Oh you are all cleaver now I have showed you what to read