What does this have to do with gas and CORGI?joe-90 said:I believe that the time has already passed to clamp down on immigration.
What does this have to do with gas and CORGI?joe-90 said:I believe that the time has already passed to clamp down on immigration.
Thank you, but no. You have not answered b-a-s's question, as was predicted by oilman earlier on this topic.joe-90 said:I've already given a definition in another thread. Go look for it.ban-all-sheds said:...but what is a "Hand-wringing limp-wristed liberal"?
If you're going to do it do it right, eh joe? I expect you run your estate agency in a similarly slip-shod fashion.joe-90 said:Be a man and stand up to counted.
Softus said:Thank you, but no. You have not answered b-a-s's question, as was predicted by oilman earlier on this topic.joe-90 said:I've already given a definition in another thread. Go look for it.ban-all-sheds said:...but what is a "Hand-wringing limp-wristed liberal"?
It remains to be seen whether b-a-s considers that to be an answer. You could be helpful and put a link here to the other topic.joe-90 said:I answered it in the thread it was originally asked.
Softus said:It remains to be seen whether b-a-s considers that to be an answer. You could be helpful and put a link here to the other topic.joe-90 said:I answered it in the thread it was originally asked.
dabaldie said:who said anything about scotland?
The definition you gave means that you consider people like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Maggie Thatcher & George W Bush to be HWLWLs.joe-90 said:Softus said:Thank you, but no. You have not answered b-a-s's question, as was predicted by oilman earlier on this topic.joe-90 said:I've already given a definition in another thread. Go look for it.ban-all-sheds said:...but what is a "Hand-wringing limp-wristed liberal"?
I answered it in the thread it was originally asked.
ban-all-sheds said:The definition you gave means that you consider people like Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Mao Zedong, Pol Pot, Maggie Thatcher & George W Bush to be HWLWLs.joe-90 said:Softus said:Thank you, but no. You have not answered b-a-s's question, as was predicted by oilman earlier on this topic.joe-90 said:I've already given a definition in another thread. Go look for it.ban-all-sheds said:...but what is a "Hand-wringing limp-wristed liberal"?
I answered it in the thread it was originally asked.
Do you stand by that definition?
I said:Why the "limp wristed" qualifier all the time?
What does it mean? What does it signify?
Do you do it because you realise that "liberal" on its own is actually a term of praise, and you are actually searching for an insult?
I'll tell you something about racists.
In every political and economic etc debate there are conflicting opinions, and some people are in vehement, even violent, opposition to others.
But by and large, most will proclaim their allegiance when defending their position. Communists will say that they are communists, and this is why. The same goes for socialists, conservatives, fascists etc.
People in the pro/anti EC debate will say what they are, and why it's right.
Capitalists will say that they are capitalists.
The list goes on and on.
But how many racists stand up and say "I'm a racist and proud of it"?
You said:You are a limp-wristed hand wringing liberal that lives in some kind of imaginary Utopia. Join the real world for a bit.
I said:What does the term "a limp-wristed hand wringing liberal" mean?
You said:It means one who's thoughts are governed by an unshakable ideology rather than pragmatism.