I will add, having reviewed my comment, that selecting data to suit your hypothesis (as trazor did) is not conducive to good theoretical research or discussion.An interesting hypothesis, trazor.
But how about if other countries, and other statistics are introduced? Does it explode your hypothesis?
For instance, keeping with European countries, Monaco has a pop density of 18,960 people per sq kilometer, yet they have a "death per 1 million" of 102, compared to UK's 465.
There are other examples that explode your hypothesis, e.g. pop density of Gibraltar 5011, death rate per million 0.
and Malta pop density of 1505, death rate 11
Figures taken from Wikipedia, as your pop density figures, and Worldometers.info
brig throws in a made-up allegation, then gets peeved when it is pointed out.
Obviously .but so many conspiracies about how does one know.....No compelling evidence for God yet half the planet believes.The evidence (if genuine) is compelling
ironically, brig sees himself as the victim.
Trump also says lots of other tosh.trump says that they have evidence that this chinese flu was manufactured in a lab in China
No compelling evidence for God yet half the planet believes.
Trump also says lots of other tosh.
One thing that has come out of all this the bias incompetence of WHO. They claim to be completely non political yet advised countries should continue to trade with China early in the outbreak. Also Taiwan told WHO about person to person transmission in December but completely ignored them (because of Chinas relation with them) & didn't even bother replying. They are completely in China's pocket financially & although I'm not a fan, I can see why Trump pulled funding (shortly followed by China increasing WHO's funding. Funny that.