smiths said:
AdamW said:
If we all just switch to drinking beer, will that cure this problem? It saved the blacksmiths during the cholera outbreaks in London.
There's no way you're that much of a geek, you must be putting it on.
Adam's right you know. The clue that set Snow on the right track, was an issolated case of a woman, in an area (Kensington I think), where no other cases had been seen before. It transpired, upon investigation, that this well-to-do woman, sent her maid to Soho every day, to collect water from the standpipe there. (she had lived there years previously and preferred the taste).
Yes, I'll admit it, I'm a bit of a geek too (I used to study endocrinology, Just for fun!)
MasonA said:
It's the same with peanuts in the bowl at the pub bar, it's full of men's urine because 95% do not wash their hands after the toilet.
Considering the practicallities of carrying out an analysis to prove this urban myth. The amount of DNA material, from any individuals urine, on the said peanuts would be microscopic. To get an ID on this small amount would require the use of a technique known as "DNA Amplification". DNA Amplification can only be used on samples free of contaminating DNA. (such as material from others urine or the peanuts themselves). Therefore, I propose, that the scientific analysis has never been undertaken.
As I have said before, 80% of all statistics are just made up.
The interesting point is, as abhorent as this sounds, human urine is generally sterile! If you are in the Jungle and you cut yourself, in the absence of clean water, it is recomended that you urinate over the cut, to clean out any infectious material. So this is probably a case of, what you don't know, won't hurt you.