David Lammy and The chicken Chidren

Prisons may be 97% full but some people don't belong there and treatment is so soft because 'officialdom' is scared of violating someones HR.

Why put someone in prison for fraud/embezzlement instead of making them work to pay back what they fiddled?
Why put someone in prison because they can't afford to pay their poll tax at the time but are expected to start making payments when they are released?
The whole system is crazy and geared towards the offended rather than the victim.
 
Sponsored Links
Prisons may be 97% full but some people don't belong there and treatment is so soft because 'officialdom' is scared of violating someones HR.

Why put someone in prison for fraud/embezzlement instead of making them work to pay back what they fiddled?
Why put someone in prison because they can't afford to pay their poll tax at the time but are expected to start making payments when they are released?
The whole system is crazy and geared towards the offended rather than the victim.

The system is geared to increase consumption and spend. Putting someone in prison for non payment of council tax costs more than the council tax that needs to be paid.
 
Prisons may be 97% full but some people don't belong there and treatment is so soft because 'officialdom' is scared of violating someones HR.

Why put someone in prison for fraud/embezzlement instead of making them work to pay back what they fiddled?
Why put someone in prison because they can't afford to pay their poll tax at the time but are expected to start making payments when they are released?
The whole system is crazy and geared towards the offended rather than the victim.

Its certainly true the prison system is broken
Austerity cuts are the major cause.

From 2011/12 to 2014/15, NOMS (National Offender Management Service) decreased its budget by close to a quarter. In financial terms, that equates to around £900 million. As might be expected, these cuts have had significant impact on the prison population. Incidences of suicide and self-harm have risen, assaults on staff are now more common, and conditions continue to deteriorate in many UK prisons.

I agree that offenders rights seem to be put above victims.

I seem to recall that rapists had a right to have a say on their childs life.

But nevertheless, if the end result of the criminal justice system is to lower crime rates and thus fewer victims, harsher sentences arent the first port of call.
 
Sponsored Links
To be fair though, I cant see anybody wanting to say it was their idea first :ROFLMAO:


I can imagine sitting around the cabinet table... Just had lunch.

Boris... OK what's next on the agengada today..

His secretary says its Knife crime Mr Prime Minister.

OK any new ideas

_ _ _ _.... How about we put little signs on chicken boxes?

Boris.... Do they eat Chicken

_ _ _ _...... Yes PM. Its what all black people eat...

Boris..... Well let's give it a go.

Whats next on the agenda.

Secretary...... The Americans Sir.... They want Included in any such trade agreement us to take 25 Tones of Clorinated Chicken per month.

Boris...... OK tell them yes we agree to that......
Andrea knock that chicken out to the chicken shops at a knocked down rate. But they have to buy their boxes from us.
 
Putting someone in prison for non payment of council tax costs more than the council tax that needs to be paid.
So what’s the solution - let anyone off if their crime is below the cost of keeping them in jail? Nah, everyone will be doing it. They go to jail as punishment so that hopefully they learn a lesson and don’t do it again and as an example to others and sod the cost.
 
Sponsored Links
Back
Top